User:Scribner/Sodasocks

Sockpuppet Publicola
Let's document a few connections...


 * 1) Here you are commenting on Striver's talk page several times under the name Pepsidrinka.
 * 2) Look, it's the barnstar Striver gave us on your sock's page.
 * 3) Here's you (your sock, Publicola) and Striver working on the Shock and Awe article
 * 4) Here's an IP reverting a sock tag I placed on your puppet's page.
 * 5) Here's your sock reverting Starcare's sock puppet tag shortly afterwards.
 * 6) Interesting to note both (IP and Starcare) show interest in battery power cars (IP #1),(IP #2) and here for Starcare.
 * 7) Look at who welcomed Starcare. Kind of telling, Pepsidrinka. The company you keep.
 * 8) People are talking.
 * 9) This 9/11 looks odd.
 * 10) Publicola said, "...I have never edited any articles having to do with anything about Muslims or Jews before ever, I'm sure."  Ok, let's look at his contribs, clearly he's lying.
 * 11) 911, Isalmic edits, and Striver
 * 12) More Publicola and Striver. Remember Banu Nadir?
 * 13) Publicola's war Aminz is a part of this war, remember him/her? Aminz just nominated Striver for admin.

Do not remove this
I'll add to this section as new information surfaces. --Scribner 04:50, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Get a WP:RFCU or stop attacking Pepsidrinka. – Chacor 03:33, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Providing proof is not attacking. More to come.--Scribner 04:13, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The only solid proof is checkuser, which, even then, doesn't confirm anything. Get a checkuser, and stop harassing him. – Chacor 04:15, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * No. Admins can vote on this, but I'm NOT requesting a vote at this point.  I'm still looking at connections.  Pepisdrinka can speak for himself.  If you have evidence contrary to what I've provided, then let's see it.--Scribner 04:21, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * If the evidence is as solid as you say it is, Scribner, there shouldn't be any problem or difficulty in getting an RFCU going. I suggest you take that route. I don't know the history of this incident, but at this point comments like "you've disgraced your adminship," coupled with un-willingness to open an RFCU, don't reflect terribly well on you -- better to be sure before we throw out such strong accusations. Luna Santin 04:23, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Objectionable comment hidden, and a vote and RFCU will be requested. Read the evidence before you judge.--Scribner 04:34, 11 September 2006 (UTC)