User:ScubaSteph/Smart Parks/Pfeifkat000 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

ScubaSteph


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ScubaSteph/Smart_Parks?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Smart Parks

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Thus far, this is more of a general article review, as there isn't a student draft as of 3/3/23.

Lead:

The lead is a single sentence; for an organization, this might be sufficient. However, it could be helpful for viewers if there was a lead paragraph that summarized the organization, its history, its contributions, and its current partnerships/projects.

Content:

The history section could potentially be more fully fleshed-out with the addition of why the group was founded (specific instances, or examples). Furthermore, a more up-to-date outline of their current operations might be a useful addition to the article.

References:

As mentioned previously, including some more updated resources would add to the notability and legitimacy of the article as a whole. Otherwise, the current references seem to be appropriate and functional.