User:Sdavis81/Cannabinoid receptor type 1/FormallyTrainedHomunculus Peer Review

General info
Sdavis81
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * Everything added is relevant and neutral, as most of the information is factual and cited directly as raw information about the receptors themselves. While there is some information related to how these receptors may play into conditions such as Alzheimer's, they are stated as a possible link rather than purely causal statements, and they have citations to a literature review that summarizes findings rather than a singular study that suggests these relationships.
 * One suggestion I have is purely organizational: while the first passage is related to pathological conditions, the second portion elaborates on how these receptors work in typical neurological processes such as food intake and learning/memory. This information is sound, but it might better fit elsewhere in the article as it is a bit disjointed in a section that elaborates on pathology related to the receptors. Another option would be to relate how this typical function is affected in pathology involving these processes in this section, while adding a portion earlier in the article about these functions of the receptors before relating them back to pathology in this section. This might also help you add more to your article overall!