User:Sdixon27/UV Coloration in Flowers/Mallard23 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Sdixon27)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Editing User:Sdixon27/UV Coloration in Flowers - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Editing User:Sdixon27/UV Coloration in Flowers - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Seth,

Okay, I enjoyed the read; however, let's look at the maintenance stuff! I think once you get your sections up you will be looking pretty good. I would be careful about the flow while getting your sections up. I say this because some your paragraphs have different topics within them. For example, I would make sure you have a section for UV coloration in flowers, how UV coloration is achieved, coevolution, and talk about pollinators and preferences, etc. So, start with a lead section and talk about the sections you will present. Hopefully, listing these sections will give you an idea on how to get this structured and organized. I believe everything you have in your article is great you just need to get them into digestible sections. The sections make it much easier to read and digest. So, as you dive back into this, you might have to pull somethings around and kind of play with it a little bit as your developing your sections. Also, just don't forget about those references, I'm sure you aware of this! Finally, I think your last paragraph has content that will fit well when you work on your lead section. Again. I would play around with it and see if you can salvage that last paragraph because I agree with Annikah it doesn't fit there. However, it is definitely usable, so I wouldn't necessarily delete it. See what you can do with it.

Best regards,

Chason Duck