User:Sdmlas/Inoculation theory/Spenn7 Peer Review

General info
User:Sdmlas/Inoculation theory/Spenn7 Peer Review
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Sdmlas/Inoculation theory
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Inoculation theory

Evaluate the drafted changes
I find the lead paragraph in the inoculation theory article (Inoculation theory) to clearly describe the topic, and state how inoculation theory shows that attitudes or beliefs can be protected against persuasion. The overall content of the article is strong, and stays relevant to the main topic, but showed biases. Although, it is hard to not be biased when it comes to theories, so it makes sense on why this article has biases. The section you chose to add on to is is relevant to the topic and important to it, because it talks about who created inoculation theory, and why he did. This is relevant because it continues on the topic of persuasion. I think the content you added is not very neutral though, because you stated, "can best be explained by," which is biased and can persuade the reader to favor the viewpoint you stated over others. I think the organization is well-written and easy to read, and there were a few sources also in the article. I think overall it is a good article, but you can strengthen it and improve it more if you go into detail on inoculation theory "centering on threat," and what that really means, because it was kind of confusing.