User:Sdp543/Obayifo/VikingVeteran Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Sdp543


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Obayifo


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Obayifo

Evaluate the drafted changes
Q1: Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

-The part about the witch is distracting. It doesn’t have where it is referenced from.

-The part about the Dahomey people is a little off putting due to it only being referenced once so far.

Q2: Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

-Overall the article is neutral but then again it is very short. The part about the Dahomey people would need to be referenced again if you intend to put it in the article.

Q3: Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

-The Dahomey people are underrepresented.

Q4: Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

-Unsure if it supports the claim. Have to purchase the book to know what it says. Maybe find a source that is free for others to be able to check and then reference that one.

Q5: Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

-Unable to check sources

Q6: Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?

-There is clearly a lot of information missing but this may be due to the original poster not including enough when the article began. I was not able to check sources due to the purchasing of the book.