User:Seabuckthorn/sandbox (GAN analysis template)


 * 1: :
 * 1a: .
 * In what ways does this article pass 1a, and what 1a problems exist?


 * 1b: .
 * Are there problems with the lead? With the layout? With the other sections listed above?


 * 2: :
 * 2a: .
 * Do you see any significant problem with the "References" section?
 * 2b: .
 * Are there any statements that need to be sourced, but aren't? Are any of the sources unreliable or problematic?
 * 2c: .
 * Do you see any evidence of original research?


 * 3: :
 * 3a: .
 * Are there aspects to this article that should be covered, but are missing?
 * 3b: .
 * Does the article go into unnecessary detail into any aspect?


 * 4: :
 * Does the article have neutrality problems? Does it fail to mention any notable POV?


 * 5: :
 * Is the article suffering from an edit war?


 * 6: :
 * There are no images in this article. Is that a problem?


 * Other aspects...
 * Are there any other things you'd want to bring up in this review?