User:Seabuntin/Burkholderia cenocepacia/Mfavro Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

I am reviewing the work of my classmates with the usernames, Ccd38148, Ebuntin, Seabuntin, and Zec57612.


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Seabuntin/Burkholderia_cenocepacia?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Burkholderia cenocepacia

Evaluate the drafted changes
The sandbox had a good deal of edits for the article. The lead section is robust and gives a really good idea as to what the article is about. Taxonomy definitely needs some more information, which I am sure will come with time. The structure of the article is outlined nicely, and looks like it will be quite a hefty article once all of the sections have some additional development. The references all appear to be peer reviewed sources, and are pretty up to date. The article itself also seems neutral and objective, with little to no bias appearing to be present in the sections currently written out in the sandbox. Some of the information included needs to have citations included, such as the motility section, which has good and comprehensive information but no citation to back it up. Most of the other statements appear to have good citations, but there are a few sections in which the editors should make sure to add complete citations to all of the statements being made. Overall, the article looks like it is developing well, and has some really good potential. With some small adjustments to the citations, and some additionally information to beef all the sections up this article will look really really good.