User:Seabuntin/Burkholderia cenocepacia/Secretly a power ranger 2 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Seabuntin


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Burkholderia cenocepacia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The data in the beginning of the article is concise and to the point. I feel as though there are some areas that could definitely be elaborated on in further sections which would allow for some extra weight in the article since it is quite short for right now.

The amount of information in the article pertains to the topic of interest so it is useful. More sections regarding different points of information can be added to beef up the article. So far the amount of information is appropriate to the existing topics

Added sources are relevant as the mass majority of them were written/published within the last 2 decades.

There is only one picture shown and that is of the bacteria itself. I feel as though more pictures could be added to give better visuals of what this bacteria does when it is inside of another organism, or to show what it would look like under different lights. I believe the picture fits within wikipedias copyright rules as there is a citation. There is no link to the photo however.

The article is written in a very to the point manner. It is not too formal and it is not too informal. It is right in middle which is great as it helps give us that neutral playing field we are looking for. However, I do feel as though the introduction was a little more formal in the way it opened the paper, but it does hit with the information very easily.

The article is already off to a great start given that its information is limited. There is plenty of room for expansion and the addition of different topics pertaining to this bacteria and I am excited to see where it goes!