User:Seabuntin/Burkholderia cenocepacia/Walker16 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Seabuntin/Burholderia


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Burkholderia cenocepacia
 * Burkholderia cenocepacia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

In the opening paragraph it states that B. cenocepacia is one of 20 species of B.cepacia complex, whereas in the TAXONOMY section it contradicts that statement with "B.cepacia has split into nine species." Whether I am reading it wrong, it is still confusing so I would look at that and try to simplify or reword those sentences so they sound more agreeable.

The first sentence is PATHOGENCITY reitterates cystic fibrosis patients are more suscpetible, maybe just briefly mention that and go into the information versus saying basically what the first paragraph already said. (Information in that section sounds/looks good).

Plentiful citation