User:SealSquared/Civic technology/SeenaBerkeley Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

SealSquared


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SealSquared/Civic_technology?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Civic Technology

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, the content added is relevant and particularly niche. It, however, is relevant.
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * The content added is up-to-date, but those dates are not stated in the article itself.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * All of the added sections belong, but again improves one part of the article but is much needed.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? s the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * The topics do address Latin American populations and is well-written and developed properly.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Yes, accesible is spelled incorrectly in the Venezuela portion as well as turn decides to decides in the first paragraph.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes, the content is organized well by country and hits major points of the topic.
 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Yes, the article section is now extremely thorough when it comes to Latin American sector of civic technology.

Reply
Thank you for the feedback. I'll add dates to the platforms creation. I have also made the spelling corrections.