User:Sean.dempsey1231/Trexx Bar/AntonioVLCruz Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

The lead is short and isn't as attention grabbing as it could be in my opinion, however the lead states the significance of the bar and what the bar is known for, which are two pieces of vital information to understanding the significance of the topic. More could be done to explain the next parts of the article in the lead.

Content

The information is spare, however content provided is generally relevant to the topic of the article. The only information that I would omit from the article is the section about Clinton Square, as the information presented in that section can be found on the Clinton Square article hyperlink in the paragraph. However, the mention is important. Also, there is a typo at the end of paragraph 4 (sam-sex -> same-sex).

Tone and Balance

The tone of the article is neutral and educational. Not one part was more focused on than the others it seems, and the balance of issues tackled in the article are relevant to the topic.

Sources and References

All content that is referenced in this article is cited with linked material that provides context on the topic. I don't know how much information on Trexx is available for research and citation purposes, but more substance in the references could beef up the content of the article and allow for the removal of the Clinton Square section.

Organization

Information is structured clearly and straightforward, with headings outlining the topics discussed in each section with relevant information.

Overall

This article is great for serving as a base foundation for how an article on Trexx should look. If more emphasis was placed on beefing-up content, maintaining relevancy by omitting irrelevant sections, and creating a more engaging lead, this article could be much better and more information-heavy than it already is.