User:SeanSwindle/Horse pond/Carolinemitchell1 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Horse Pond


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Horse pond
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Things it does well = photos

Add places where you can find a horse pond

Structure is clear and the lead section is easy to understand

Balanced coverage = Good coverage but needs more information and development

Neutral content = content was neutral and unbiased

Reliable sources = both sources look reliable / add more than 2 sources