User:Seanapplegate/Educational Inequality in the United States/Michelleho1100 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Seanapplegate
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Seanapplegate/Educational Inequality in the United States

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes, sources are from 2020.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? The content is relevant to the article.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Yes, it deals with groups historically known to face inequality in education.

Content evaluation
Overall, content is informational and relevant to current pandemic.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? The main claim of the article is the fact that underrepresented racial and socioeconomic groups are more affected by education inequalities. However, it is presented in a neutral tone.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No.

Tone and balance evaluation
Tone is neutral. There is even spread of added information throughout the article.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes.
 * Are the sources current? Yes, from 2020.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Yes, different authors in all 4 sources.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes.

Sources and references evaluation
The sources appear to reliable and are very recently published.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, the syntax is well organized and clearly and concisely written.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, the content added is added to appropriate sub-categories.

Organization evaluation
Article is well-organized with good use of headings/sub-headings.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? Yes, it adds more current information regarding the COVID pandemic which I think is really important to understanding inequality of any kind.
 * How can the content added be improved? I think the content added was very informational. The only thing I would change would be add more information about the experience of online schooling (Zoom fatigue, etc.).

Overall evaluation
The information added to the article is very educational and presented in a clear and straightforward manner. The information specifically about the pandemic was very interesting and relevant to current events.