User:Seanapplegate/Online Tutoring/Michelleho1100 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Seanapplegate
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Seanapplegate/Online Tutoring

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Yes.

Content evaluation
The content is is very relevant to current events and contains many informational statistics.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No.

Tone and balance evaluation
Information is presented neutrally and does not make major claims or tries to persuade readers to take a stand.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes.
 * Are the sources current? Yes, from 2020.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Yes.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes.

Sources and references evaluation
Overall, references seem to be reliable and from experts in the field of education. They are also recently published.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, the information added was put under the COVID-19 heading which is fitting.

Organization evaluation
The information was added to one heading and was relevant to that heading.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? Yes.
 * How can the content added be improved? I think the content added is good as is. It is hard to improve content about a topic that is so recent and still developing.

Overall evaluation
Because the topic of the new information is very new and still developing, I think the author did a good job of presenting effects of online tutoring in the pandemic.