User:Seaoli12oceans12/Brucella canis/Is73500 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) Seaoli12oceans12


 * Link to draft you're reviewing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Seaoli12oceans12/Brucella_canis?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists) Brucella canis
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists) Brucella canis

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

The lead seems to be relatively updated, and neatly flows the information on the original article and the new information added to the sandbox draft. It is concise and contains relevant information.

Content

The content added is relevant and up to date.I don't see any content that does not belong, and nothing that breaches any of Wikipedia's equity gaps. If possible, I would add a bit more on how PCR was actually used to differentiate between B. canis and B. suis. You could also add some definitions to terms such as "biovar" or some background information on PCR if not previously given in the article to give more context.

Tone and Balance

Everything added seems to be quite neutral and I am not seeing any sort of bias. I would maybe add more background information to appeal to those who may not have as much knowledge in the subject area, but overall I don't see many necessary changes.

Sources and References

All sources added seem up to date and seem to be reputable. There are a large number of sources, which shows that the changes made are reputable and accurate.

Organization

Overall, all of the changes seem well organized. The last two sentences might need to be rewritten for the sake of clarity, but it is still readable.

Images and Media

No images and media were added. It might be helpful to add some images of PCR to help show what that process may look like, although it is not necessary. Additionally, adding images of B. canis and related information would reinforce the information in the article.