User:Seaoli12oceans12/Brucella canis/Npereboom Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Mfavro, Seaoli12oceans12,  Walker16


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Seaoli12oceans12/Brucella_canis?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Brucella canis

Evaluate the drafted changes
Sandbox:

The only proposed edit in the sandbox has to do with the discovery of B. canis. The information is good but I don't believe there is a citation for it. The information is unbiased and relevant.

Bibliography:

The sources in the bibliography section are relevant and correctly cited. The links work and the sources can support claims in the future.

Article:

The lead of the article is relatively strong. It provides a good introduction to the bacteria with unbiased and relevant claims. The morphology section is very undeveloped. It consists of two sentences that try and fit in as much information as possible. It would be better to detail and spread out the information in this section. The identification section needs more clarification. The relevance of the claims in this section are not ever established. The history section could also be developed further. There is little detail about the biochemical processes that are critical to the life cycle B. canis throughout the paper. Information of this would strengthen the claims made by the article.