User:Seaoli12oceans12/Brucella canis/Ragi02 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Seaoli12oceans12, Mfavro, Walker16


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Brucella canis
 * Brucella canis

Evaluate the drafted changes
This article is in its beginning stages, as there is not enough content, media, or sources. The introductory section is well made and concise, however it does not bring up many important topics regarding microbiology, such as reproduction and metabolism. Overall the tone is neutral and each statement is supported by sources without bias. The sources are mostly modern; however, there are not many sources in total, providing the article with limited information. The amount of media should also be improved as there is currently only one picture. Overall the treatment section of the article is well made; however, the other sections are short and more information shall likely be found about this article.