User:Seaoli12oceans12/Brucella canis/Reaelise13 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Brucella canis


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I think in your sandbox, the history section is well developed and the source you used looks reliable, assuming you used the one linked in the published article. Overall, the sources listed in the article look a bit sparse, but undoubtedly as you expand the article, more will be added!

There is no apparent bias which is great!

The morphology section is looking good so far, but I think you could add more info on carbon/ energy sources as well as oxygen requirements. You could also add in info about temperature requirements, salt tolerance, etc.

More photos with captioning would be a good thing to work on, as well to expand on the topic and strengthen the article.