User:Seaoli12oceans12/Brucella canis/Solis.eve Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Seaoli12oceans12


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Seaoli12oceans12/Brucella_canis?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Brucella canis

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

Currently, the lead for this article is very small, however it makes sense given that there is not a lot of material in the article yet. As more is added to the article, the lead will become more detailed, and longer.

Content

The content currently in the draft, seems like it will be a great addition to the overall article. I would like it if they would go back to each section, and see where they could add more relevant information, given that each section currently only has a few amounts of information.

Tone and Balance

The tone of the article is neutral, and there does not seem to be any bias towards one belief.

Sources and References

All the sources seem to come from good journals. However, I believe that there is definite room for finding more recent references, and for just finding more references in general. Two of the references do not have any links, which is something that should be fixed.

Organization

The organization of the article as a whole is great. Every sections flows well into the next section. To make it more concise, I would recommend grouping together everything having to do with the disease caused by the bacteria together. For example, the sections "infection," "host range," and "treatment," could all go together under one bigger section. To be clear, each of those sections, would be better as subsections for a bigger section.

Images and Media

This article is lacking a lot of images and media in general. There is only one image, which I do not think is that great at giving a detailed image of what the bacteria looks like. I would recommend, at least adding one image per section, if relevant, to enhance the quality of the article.

Overall Impressions

This article has great foundation, for a lack of better word. There is definitely room for growth and improvement of the article. I am excited to see how this article will look at the end.