User:SebastianHelm/ArbCom/2007

table • talks

Undecided

 * : no reply, but has already a link which I put there
 * : arbitrator, blocked 8 months ago; no reply to my question, has already link I put there
 * : (2006: s - Sounds reasonable, link shows good clerical work. Not sure about people skills) no reply, but has already a link which I put there last year
 * : still talking on eir page

Supported

 * : Good ArbCom clerk
 * : Amazing list of portfolion links!
 * : Nice, simple statement with several links
 * : Has not been active since Nov 26. Has already 2 links which I put there.
 * : (2006: s - Added links, one of them is OK) Is thinking of ArbCom table. Liked some links. Weak support because of "cretin" answer to question about name change. Ey had over a year to calm down eir anger!
 * : Added links - really nice portfolio!

Opposed

 * : slack statement; preferred to reply to video game questions
 * : blocked 5 months ago by other candidates (without any link); refused to provide portfolio
 * : blocked 11 months ago; did not reply to my question, did not add links
 * : (2006: u - no reaction needed) blocked 19 months ago; left Wikipedia
 * : Some conversation on eir talk page about bragging; waiting for eir reply; blocked 7 months ago; did not reply to my second question
 * : apparently inactive after eir candidacy
 * : no portfolio, no reply, although ey refuses much of a statement on the groungs of being for concise information
 * : no portfolio, no reply, apparently doesn't keep conversations together
 * : no portfolio, no reply, apparently doesn't keep conversations together
 * : no portfolio, no reply
 * : no portfolio, no reply
 * : no portfolio, no reply (has box "Messages left here may not be replied to promptly." - but that's just what I would expect!)
 * : no portfolio, no reply
 * : Too confrontational and too much into requiring "deference" from others. However, his admirable enthusiasm for Wikipedia makes me hope he'll find a more suitable position here. Unfortunately, I can not quote the deference part directly since it was in a private mail, but the combination "Swatjester" and "deference" has a few hits on Google.
 * : no reply, but has already 2 links which I put there
 * : Added many links - needle in haystack. Seems fishy to me
 * : no reply, but has already 2 links which I put there. I asked new question Dec 4 (still watching page)
 * : no portfolio, no reply
 * : no portfolio, no reply, insists on semi-protecting her talk page

Withdrawn before I voted

 * : Replied with Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007/Summary table‎ (still watching page)
 * : no reply, but has already a link which I put there
 * : added links (with bef-aft)