User:SebastianHelm/ArbCom/2008

This year I have less time for the election than in the previous years, so I'm relying mostly on the following pages:


 * User:SandyGeorgia/ArbVotes
 * User:Lar/ACE2008
 * User:Secret/ArbCom
 * User:East718/ACE2008
 * User:MBisanz/ACE2008
 * User:Elonka/ACE2008
 * Last year's: table • talks

Support

 * : Of course!
 * : Good work in the last years on ArbCom table
 * : Honest, modest reply. But Lar makes a good point about not moving along crisply. Already voted, but may reconsider.
 * : insufficient history; User:Secret opposes with reason (but that reason is weak). Lar: strong support, and he has a point. That guy is brilliant! (already voted oppose, will change to support.)

Lean towards support

 * : SandyGeorgia +; Lar +
 * : SandyGeorgia is unsure, Lar is enthused.
 * : SandyGeorgia ++; Sherurcij's links make me waver. At least the explanations could have been better.
 * : SandyGeorgia ++; Elonka says he doesn't have any DR experience.
 * : SandyGeorgia +; Elonka: not an independent thinker and some other reasons
 * : Hmm Lar proposed him, but one of the unserious replies Elonka cites is towards Lar. Maybe a candidate for BJAODN - or is that Uncyclopedia now?
 * : supported last year (2007: Has not been active since Nov 26. Has already 2 links which I put there.) Lars +; Elonka says he's not a promise keeper

Undecided

 * : supported 2006 and 2007 (2006: Added links, one of them is OK; 2007: Is thinking of ArbCom table. Liked some links. Weak support because of "cretin" answer to question about name change. Ey had over a year to calm down eir anger!)

Lean to oppose
(per SandyGeorgia's list, unless stated otherwise)
 * : I don't mind the oppose votes as SandyGeorgia does, but from a candidate I would like to see a some statement why votes for or against a potential future team mate.
 * : I don't mind the oppose votes as SandyGeorgia does, but from a candidate I would like to see a some statement why votes for or against a potential future team mate.
 * : I don't mind the oppose votes as SandyGeorgia does, but from a candidate I would like to see a some statement why votes for or against a potential future team mate.

Oppose

 * : Opposed last year. SandyGeorge says nothing that changes my mind; User:Secret opposes with reason. (2007: Some conversation on eir talk page about bragging; waiting for eir reply; blocked 7 months ago; did not reply to my second question)
 * : opposed last year, SandyGeorge says nothing that changes my mind. (2007: no portfolio, no reply)
 * : insufficient history; User:Secret opposes with reason
 * : insufficient history
 * : insufficient history
 * : User:Secret opposes with reason
 * : User:Secret opposes with reason
 * : per Lar

Abstain

 * : insufficient history; but one user said candidate had good character and didn't deserve to be so low. Going along with Lar's argument and abstain.
 * : insufficient history; but one user said candidate had good character and didn't deserve to be so low. Going along with Lar's argument and abstain.
 * : insufficient history; but one user said candidate had good character and didn't deserve to be so low. Going along with Lar's argument and abstain.
 * : insufficient history; but one user said candidate had good character and didn't deserve to be so low. Going along with Lar's argument and abstain.
 * : insufficient history; but one user said candidate had good character and didn't deserve to be so low. Going along with Lar's argument and abstain.