User:Secretshrub/Aquatic toxicology/Mguy170 Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Both of the points that have been added are cited.

Both citations are valid and support the statements/claims made by the author.

In the section that mentions the Mussel watch program, you may want to add more information about that program to expand the content.

When you mention the EPA's guidelines, you did not specify what those guidelines are. You should add a section here on what the specific guidelines are.

Overall, your statements are clear and supported by the citations, but they need to be expanded.