User:Sedwa077/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (link) Malden Mills
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
 * It is an interesting case of a company executive, trying to save his company despite the odds being against him.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? no
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? concise

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? yes it is
 * Is the content up-to-date? no it isn't
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? it has year gaps and doesn't give enough for the details of the fire.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? it is
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? there is only representation of the fire and not much on the company's history
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? no

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? yes
 * Are the sources current? no
 * Check a few links. Do they work? yes

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? it could be written better
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? yes
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? yes

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? no
 * Are images well-captioned? n/a
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? n/a
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?n/a

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? There was information that more should be added about the history
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?rated as satisfactory. it's a part of wiki business
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? no

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? needs to add more details on the fire and its effects
 * What are the article's strengths? Provides an outline for more to be added
 * How can the article be improved? the wording and adding more to the area on the fire and adding a history section
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? underdeveloped

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback:
 * Talk:Malden Mills