User:Seganey/Art therapy/Isah1998 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Seganey


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Seganey/Art_therapy?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Art therapy

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

Lead seems to be in a good shape. Overview clear and not too wordy.

Content

Content is relevant to article but it needs to be reworded in your own words. Whatever information you find make sure its worded so the average person can understand what's being said. Wikipedia also prefers if you avoid longer quotes in most situations. Content is up to date.

Tone and Balance

The information provided is neutral

Sources and References

Sources are close to to the 5 year mark so they are more relevant. Citation easy to find. More citations are needed to add to your contribution and relevance for the article.

Organization

Placement of information in Dementia section does fit. A stronger connection to the section and your information is needed.

Overall Impressions

Information has potential to increase relevancy of article. Information you found needs to be said in your own words and connect to the section more clearly.