User:Seheistand/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Leptodactylus fallax

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I was intrigued by the species nickname and I wanted to learn more about the species and make it the topic of my class project.

Evaluate the article
The article's lead section focuses on the history of decline of the subject species, Leptodactylus fallax, and includes other important general information regarding the species. The lead is overly specific and goes too deeply into details provided later in the article and is not as brief or concise as it should be.

The content is relevant and includes a dense though vital history of the species.

The tone is neutral and does not attempt to sway the reader in any particular direction, i.e. advocate for the species's conservation..

There is a broad range of references (18 in total) and the most recent sources are from 2020, which is acceptably recent.

The article is concise and easy to read for any reader.

The images included contribute to the article and provide a relevant visual aid for the reader.

The talk page discussion is extremely limited and does not indicate much relevance to the article as most of the posts relate to how the species "tastes like chicken."

The article's status is C, so there is work that can be done to the article, and the subject is of mid-importance. The article is well-developed though it is missing some things.