User:Selena48/Eliot Hall (Reed College)/Karathompson1 Peer Review

Peer review
Hi, this is Kara from your Medieval Portland class.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Selena48
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Selena48/Eliot Hall (Reed College)

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is very concise.

Lead evaluation
I think that the lead is very well written and to the point. It definitely gives an introduction to ideas that you talk about later, except I do not believe that the part about who Eliot Hall is named after comes up again. Maybe you can include why it was named after them.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Maybe add why it was named after Eliot.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Tone and balance evaluation
This article has a very neutral tone. It feels informative rather than persuasive.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Organization evaluation
It is very well organized and easy to comprehend.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes
 * What are the strengths of the content added? It is well organized and described the style and construction of the building in great detail.
 * How can the content added be improved? Possibly more of a balance between construction and the history of it. There is not much of the historical background compared to the amount of words used to describe the style and construction.

Overall evaluation
Great job! My critiques are nit-picky, this is a great article.