User:Seliciafield/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Ellen Prince
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
 * I chose this article because I was unfamiliar with Ellen Prince and I wanted to gather more information about this individual and her relations to pragmatics.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
The Lead starts of with a brief evaluation of who Ellen Prince was, including when she was born and when she died. It also does give insist to what exactly her relations was to pragmatics and field of work. It is not too long and straight to the point, and also gives insist to a few points of her work.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Content evaluation
The articles content is also very consistent and gives a lot of information to the main aspects of Ellen Princes life, including her work study, publications, interests, etc. Everything seems updated and no unneccesary content.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are over represented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
Tone and balance is very neutral and no conflicting or favoring is present. Since this article is more of a biography of Ellen Prince there is no stand point to a certain argument and or topic.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
The links and resources do work and they do back up the information given in the content. References are available and there are external links that relate more an go further into depth about different information in the article.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
Organization is very neat and the flow of the article is also great. The sentence link to one another and support each other to overall highlight and emphasize the point of the article.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
There are no images present on this article page.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Talk page evaluation
This article is apart of two WikiProjects including Biography and Women, and it rated Start-Class on both scales. There is not much conversation present on the Talk Page but it does have a question referring to how Ellen Prince died.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Overall evaluation
This article was very precise and well organized in my opinion. It was well developed and went into good detail about Ellen Prince's work background relating to Pragmatics. The only thing I would say I would improve or add, is that I think it should have included more detail into her life before school and pragmatics to get an inside to her lifestyle to see how she developed a love for the field of Pragmatics.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: