User:Semunm17/Crater counting/Zanvit Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Semunm17


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Semunm17/Crater_counting?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Crater counting

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead section

From the published article, I really don't have suggestions on how to make it shorter, though "on the Moon of areas covered by giant mares", is mares the plural name for mare?

Content/Tone and Balance

I think that the history seems like a good idea. Though I will suggest making it more direct and focused on the changes it has gone through to become the actual model (The model evolution if that makes sense).

My suggestion for this part would be saying something like: "the first one to apply this method was Ernst Öpik, based on the idea of ... (history about how this was developed). Later refined by Bill Hartman, which added... ...(what was the most important change). This method has been used for a,b and c places- with A, B and C changes and today it applies ...

The criticism section

I think parts of this section could be added. However, Wikipedia itself just gives out the information, regardless if it is a method that might or might not be right or still used/correct. If you add this as a criticism section it might be dealing a bit with the tone or neutrality (balance). With that in mind and considering it is a scientific article, I would recommend to add part of the information into the main body of the article stating the facts about the flaws of the model. Like what are the difficulties of this method, I think this is a especially good phrase "Planets heavily covered by water or dense atmosphere would also impede the accuracy of this method (maybe citation?). Planets with dense atmospheres will also cause meteors to burn up due to friction before impacting the surface of the planet. "

Applications

These seems very good on how they have been applied on different articles, I think this could be worked out as what are the important messages of each article, what they used from the model or what the results of them were.

Sources and References

great job with the citations! They seem appropriate and it's great that you are adding so many references 9+, I think it would be a good idea to add a link to citation 10 on the "age of the inner solar system"

Overall impressions

I think this is a great article to work with, the adding references will give it a good support and the overall ideas are good in my opinion.