User:Semvi/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magasin_(archives_et_biblioth%C3%A8ques)
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. C'est l'article que mon équipe a décidé de modifier

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Oui
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Non
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Il n'y a pas de sections dans l'article
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Il n'y a pas de lead distinct

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Oui
 * Is the content up-to-date? Oui
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Oui, il manque du contenu
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Non

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Oui
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Non
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Non
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? Non

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Non
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Non
 * Are the sources current? Il n'y a pas de sources
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Non, car il n'y a pas de sources
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Il n'y en a pas.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Oui
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? Non
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Non, il n'y a pas d'organisation claire.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Oui
 * Are images well-captioned? Non
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Non
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Oui

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? Il n'y en a pas. Juste une note pour changer le titre de l'article
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? Moyen.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? L'article n'est pas complet, il n'indique aucune structure claire, il ne respecte pas toutes les consignes wikipédiennes.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? Plutôt mauvais
 * What are the article's strengths? Bon résumé de la thématique
 * How can the article be improved? Compléter l'article avec des sections, des sources et plus d'informations
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? Mal développé

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion:Magasin_(archives_et_biblioth%C3%A8ques)#Question_en_lien_avec_le_TP2