User:Sepetras/English-only movement/Akornowski Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Sepetras


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sepetras/English-only_movement?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * English-only movement

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

akornowski peer review:

Lead: The lead does not have any new added information. The lead of the original article seems to be a good summary of the information to follow. I would suggest adding some new information.

Content: The content added that I identified was only under early the efforts section. The 1753 information was the only new material I can see that was added. I would recommend adding much more to this article’s content.

Tone and balance: The content added is neutral.

Sources: The sources are great with the use of .gov sites. The use of .org websites is also great. The sources are diverse, reliable, and up to date. The links I tested worked.

Organization: The organization is goo with the headers of the sections. It is identical to the original article so I would suggest changing that up a bit.

Images: No images.

Impression: My impression is that the article is on the right track with strong organization and sourcing, but needs to make the article more complete through adding new material. The impression is that it is still too similar to the original article.