User:Sepetras/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(University of Dayton)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
This is where we all attend University.

Evaluate the article
Lead

Good intro sentence?

Yes, it is clear this article is in regard to the University, the founding year and the type of university.

Description of major sections?

The contents include history, campus, academics, research, housing, student life athletics, and notable people. Not all of these major sections are mentioned in the intro paragraph. Unless you consider student life athletics talking about a Super Bowl winning coach.

Information not included?

Everything mentioned in the intro section is re mentioned throughout the article.

Overall, the lead it concise. Not sure if the notable alum need to be listed in the lead.

Content

Relevant?

All information is relevant.

Up-to-date?

There is the correct amount of years following how many years ago it was established.

The enrollment status was updated in 2020 for the total amount of full time students. It definitely could be updated with the content. Mid 2010s seems to be the latest it was updated.

Equality gaps?

No, the article does not mention ethnic data.

Tone and Balance

This article is completely neutral. There are no arguments are bias information within the article which is not surprising considering the topic.

Sources and References

Better sources available?

All facts backed up?

Yes, all facts are back dup within the article.

Thorough sources?

When clicking through the sources, they are all thorough and reflect the content.

Diverse?

They are also written by a vast amount of diverse sources, for the most part, current years.

Links work?

Yes, all the links I have used are working.

Organization

Well written?

This article is well written and easy to follow.

Errors?

I did not see any grammatical errors or spelling errors.

Well organized?

Yes, the article lists more of the revenant information in the beginning and the less common information searched for on the bottom.

Images and Media

Relevant images?

There are a few images that go along with the topics of the sections.

Well captioned?

Yes, they are accurate and concise captions.

Adhere to wiki?

Yes, they follow the guidelines.

Layout?

Yes, they are simply laid out in a visually appealing way.

Talk page

Conversations?

In 2005, there was a conversation in regards to the bias of the article, which since then has been fixed up. There used to be a bunch of POV.

Rated?

This has a C class quality scale and low on the importance scale.

Overall, this article is not the most important, considering those who are interested in Dayton may look at their homepage before wiki, and the audience, in the grand scheme of things, is pretty low. It does provide all the information necessary.