User:Seracallahan/Jo Nesbitt/ImGemstone Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Seracallahan's new article on Jo Nesbit


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Seracallahan/Jo_Nesbitt?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * This is a new article still in the drafting phase.

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Grammar
Some topics featured in the article could use links to other existing Wiki articles, like Gay Left and Herizons. Anthologies or comic books like these need to be in italics.

Structure
The lead section has a good first couple sentences. The rest of the lead will need brief mentions about the proceeding headings/section. A "Personal Life" or biography section can help establish the context of her works influences; the lead section already insinuates that there will be information on this topic. A good section could inform the reader a little about each of the artist's works and how it might have been influenced (by time period, cultural moment, other artists, etc.). Will her translated works be listed in the "translator" section along with a description of that job or will it have a distinguished section with her own authored/illustrated works?

New Article and Overall Readability
So far, the artist is notable for her inclusion in popular anthologies like Dyke Strippers. To further establish notability, listing awards and/or accomplishments in a new section can convey the importance of this person and her contributions. This article has potential.