User:Serendipitysss/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Technical writing

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

First, I am interested in the topic of Technical writing, it's widely used in the major of Data Science, which I am taking. My preliminary impression about the article is that I feel it's less detailed, there're should be more exampels to help readers get a better understanding of technical writing.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Evaluating content:

Everything in the article are relevant to the topic.

There are missing citations to support idea in the part of Technical documents.

The article is neutral.

The link for citation #9 is unavailable. And I don't think the link #1 is a reliable source.

In the talk page, I see there are two other authors have different opinions about the exact defintion of Techinical writing. One thinks resumes should not be categorized as technical writing.