User:Sevanzandt/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Mental health court

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Mental health courts relates directly to the article featuring an Alaskan that I intend to write. Also, as a legal studies major, my dream is to practice law in the mental health courts.

Evaluate the article
The introductory sentence does not define the defender who is receiving support from mental health courts. The lead sections fails to use the term "people with mental illness" until the last sentence. The history content does not include many historical dates and locations. The tone of the article feels like the author is advocating for mental health courts. The sources are diverse and seemingly reliable, but many are outdated. Also, some of the source links are dead. With that, not all of the facts in the article are cited. With further research, the article has the potential to grow! It could use more content! For example, the definition section is very short, with only one citation. There are no images. The talk page is almost silent; it only displays more people noticing the dead source links. I think that this article is a little old and could use some dusting.