User:SeventyThree/Humour

Links to
Wikipedia talk:Userboxes/Colours - Don't be a dick - User:Keithgreer/mrducky - User:UBX/1337-N - INTERCAL - spoiler diff - Invisible Pink Unicorn - Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_May_11

How much is that doggy in the window?
I don't know. But thanks to inflation it will be more expensive when you come back for another look. Unless you live in Japan because there was deflation there. Which is bad for a market economy. I don't like annimals much anyway. Nor do I like taxidermy. I saw a documentary on BBC2 about them so I think they are special people.

— Luccent

Quotes
"Just because the book is upside down that doesn't mean I don't know it is upside down. I will not be stopped from reading due to discrimination of that nature." — User:Raoulharris

"If your statement is longer than 200 words, every second word will be removed" — Radiant!

Culture of England

 * 1) REDIRECT pub

Consensus
From Wikipedia_talk:Root_page

This concept has clearly failed to achieve consensus, and the discussion no longer seems to be going anywhere. It seems pretty clear that this proposal has no hope of ever achieving consensus. What is the process for deciding when it is appropriate to apply the rejected tag?--Srleffler 23:10, 10 April 2006 (UTC)


 * I think we can add it now. Everyone has rejected it except the two proposers, as evidenced by
 * This talk page
 * Its archives
 * Templates_for_deletion/Log/2006_April_6
 * Templates_for_deletion/Log/2006_April_2,
 * Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_April_6


 * A rejected page is any proposal for which consensus support is not present, regardless of whether there's active discussion or not. Making small changes will not change this fact, nor will repetitive arguments. Generally it is wiser to rewrite a rejected proposal from scratch and starting in a different direction.
 * Note that, if there is an official "process" for adding the rejected tag, step 2 is probably Revert war. — Omegatron 00:26, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Shot

 * I submit that anyone who attempts such a POV-pushing campaign simply should be shot. Repeatedly. In the genitals. With a howitzer.
 * &mdash;Andux␅ 03:18, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

From here