User:Sexandlove

=What i´ve done:= First things about Fukushima I nuclear accidents. Saw this and expected deaths, which will sorrowful come true. Written some knowledge to help, that this and further nuclear accidents won´t go as bad as Chernobyl. But as clear as water-cooling failed for now 2 weeks, nearly nobody understands a thing how to improve and stop radiation and deaths.

Minimum triple deplorable tragedy: No brain to make it right, no brain to understand the warnings for decades and no brain to learn. Especially from me :-).

Italics content is fully by me. Think its important and the best solution. Somehow proud about knowing that.

Total emission
''The Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics estimated the total emissions of iodine-131 from 12 to 15 March at 4x1017 Bequerel, which is about 20% of the total emissions during the Chernobyl disaster. The emissions of Cesium-137 of the first 4 days were estimated to 3.3 x 1016 Bq, which is about 50% of the total emissions during the Chernobyl disaster. According to this data and data from Institut de radioprotection et de sûreté nucléaire a scientific consultant prepared for Greenpeace an analysis in which he rated the total Fukushima I accident at INES level 7 by March 24th. This can be quite easily roughly revised with the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale (INES) User´s Manual. ''