User:Sfgadsden/Buddhist symbolism/Jad Mada Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Sfgadsden


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sfgadsden/Buddhist_symbolism?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Buddhist symbolism

Evaluate the drafted changes
Hello Sfgadsden,

Here is my Peer Review:

Lead


 * No, a Lead section is not presented in the article draft.

-I would advise you to create a Lead section that would outline the information delivered in the article’s subsequent sections.

Content

Tone and Balance Additional Feedback: Organization Sources and References
 * Yes, the content added is relevant to the topic.
 * The content added is up-to-date.
 * No, no content is missing or does not belong.
 * No, the article does not address any topics related to historically underrepresented populations.
 * The content added is neutral.
 * No, no claims appear heavily biased toward a particular position.
 * No, there are no viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented.
 * No, the added content is unbiased and does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another.
 * I appreciate how you maintained nobility and credibility throughout the article by using a neutral tone. The content you added is educational, meaningful, unbiased, and relevant.
 * Yes, the content added was well-written.
 * No, the content added does not have any grammatical or spelling errors.
 * The new content is well-organized, clearly explaining the sections to which each edit corresponds.


 * No, parts of the new content are not backed up by a reliable secondary source of information.
 * Yes,  the content accurately reflects what the cited sources say.
 * No, the sources are not thorough and peer-reviewed. For instance, please refrain from citing the source, "Mokugyo Fish Drum: The Zen of Drumming for a Wakeful Mind and Mindfulness with the Wooden Fish Drum's Unique Sound - Buddha Weekly: Buddhist Practices, Mindfulness, Meditation”; this is not a scholarly-peer reviewed source.
 * The sources are current.
 * Yes, the sources are written by a diverse spectrum of authors. No, historically marginalized individuals are not described.
 * Yes, the links work.

Overall Impressions
 * The article added does slightly improve the overall quality of the article, however, I recommend further developing the article and contributing more information.
 * The content featured different links to related Wikipedia pages, allowing the reader to further understand the ideas found throughout the article.
 * The additional content can be improved by citing more scholarly, peer-reviewed secondary sources to validate the information in the article.

~Jad Mada