User:Sgagliar1919/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
English studies

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because the academic discipline for this class is English. I was also interested in learning more about English as a post secondary discipline.

Evaluate the article
The lead section for this article clearly outlines and defines what the article will be talking about. It is not too lengthy and gets straight to the point. The content of the article is up to date and relevant. The article fails to provide information about English as a discipline in high school and earlier grades. The tone of the article is neutral and does not come off as biased in any form. The article lacks inline citations which brings up questions about credibility. However, there are references cited at the end of the article. These references range from 1941-2017 providing a good range of information while still being relevant and up to date. The article is easy to read and there are no grammatical errors. The articles talk page consisted of multiple conversations about revisions being needed, however, these were from the early 2000's and have since been fixed. The article is a part of three WikiProjects. The article is unverified, but it does contain useful information in regards to English as a post secondary discipline. This article seems to be well developed as it has been in development for many years and seems to have been revised and edited multiple times.