User:Sgdixon/Aminoacyl-tRNA/Agnihotrin123 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

1.    Is it obvious to you which sections of the article have been revised? Is the new content relevant to the topic?

'''Yes. The author clearly marked which sections had entirely new information from research, which sections were rearranged with existing information and which information had been used from the article but moved in a different section for improved clarity and readability. The new content is very helpful in understanding the role and purpose of aminoacyl-tRNA that was originally unclear in the unedited article.'''

2.  What does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any particular information that you found especially informative.

'''The article does a good job integrating information from multiple sources to give a clear picture of the purpose and actions of the aa-tRNA. Because it is not a common RNA that biology classes discuss it is important to have a good baseline understanding within the first few sentences. The author did a good job rearranging and adding in easy to read information that does not compromise the scientific complexity of the aa-tRNA. The section regarding general information did a better job than the original article. It was concise but detailed enough to be informative. The sentence which links a reader's previously understood purpose of a tRNA with what this specific tRNA does is essential to connecting the dots for a reader.'''

3.  What overall adjustments do you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement? What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?

'''The author could include a more detailed section with purpose and function within the cell with a clear layout of all the areas that the aa-tRNA works in. These changes would from the beginning have a clear section that is designated for a big picture understanding of what the molecule does. Although having a general information section is helpful, having it labeled and organized into subsections is a better way to distribute information. Instead of reading one large paragraph at the top of the article the reader and refer to a specific section about purpose and specific listed/bullet pointed functions within the cell. These organizational tips are probably the most important thing other than fleshing out the article and adding more information.'''

4. Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know.

'''aa-tRNA seem to be very involved in genetic expression through protein synthesis. They are essential in making sure that the cell is functioning properly. Although my article is about transposable elements which are genes not proteins. Their regulation might be tied to aa-tRNA (might be worth a look into).'''

5. Is all new content backed up by a reliable source of information?

Yes, All of the author's sources are relatively current and from respectable and reputable peer-reviewed journals.

6. Are the sources fairly current (> 2015)? Check a few links. Do they work?

'''Yes, most of the author's sources are newer than 2015 however there are a few journals from the 70's that may be outdated. The links all work!'''

7. Summarize any typographical/grammatical errors that you found.

'''I saw none. The author was very thorough in their careful writing.'''

8. Student authors are responsible for all images on their page (even if not part of their revised subsection). Double check the original page to make sure images are acceptable and clearly described. See associated tutorial to review Wiki image requirements. Summarize your findings.

The image from the original page is well described and cited within their article and is relevant and important to the information being presented in the article.

9. Identify at least one additional reference that you think may contribute to the article. Explain why you think this article would benefit from the new information. Be sure to provide the reference in your write-up.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC99026/

'''The above article discusses the relationship between tetracyclines and essential translational molecules within the cell. The drug is mentioned in the article in one sentence and although this particular source is a little older it may be helpful in aiding the section started by the original creator of the article. The real life application of molecular biology is what makes it the most relevant to the greatest number of people. By including practical information that is easily accessible in your article it can engage readers that may not have the strongest background in molecular biology.'''