User:Sgeureka/Neurotypical

Computer Science
 * https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1362361320981317 Autistic parents’ views and experiences of talking about autism with their autistic children
 * https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1750946716300186?via%3Dihub Parents on the autism continuum: Links with parenting efficacy
 * https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.97.8.4404 Intentionality detection and “mindreading”: Why does game form matter?
 * https://www.cell.com/trends/cognitive-sciences/fulltext/S1364-6613(21)00125-X Enhanced rationality in autism spectrum disorder
 * https://psyche.co/ideas/autistic-people-challenge-preconceived-ideas-about-rationality While cognitive biases commonly sway decision-making, Autistic people might be less susceptible to such biases
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5514024/ Investigation of autistic traits through strategic decision-making in games with adaptive agents
 * https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.782610/full Moral Foundations Theory Among Autistic and Neurotypical Children
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8918663/ ASD and ADHD Comorbidity: What Are We Talking About?
 * https://neurodivergentinsights.com/misdiagnosis-monday/adhd-vs-autism Autism and ADHD Overlap
 * https://dc.uwm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3644&context=etd Understanding Computer Science Students' Characteristics and How They Affect Their Performance in ClassHow They Affect Their Performance in Class
 * https://sites.asee.org/se/wp-content/uploads/sites/56/2021/04/2018ASEESE30.pdf The Missing Element: A Discussion of Autism Spectrum Disorders in
 * https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcv2.12142 Categorical versus dimensional structure of autism spectrum disorder: A multi-method investigation
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9579965/ Hyperfocus or flow? Attentional strengths in autism spectrum disorder
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6331660/ Overlaps and distinctions between attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder in young adulthood: Systematic review and guiding framework for EEG-imaging research
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6093794/ Overlapping and Distinct Cognitive Impairments in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity and Autism Spectrum Disorder without Intellectual Disability
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2677578/ Explaining and inducing savant skills: privileged access to lower level, less-processed information
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5071629/ From High Intellectual Potential to Asperger Syndrome: Evidence for Differences and a Fundamental Overlap—A Systematic Review
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8699491/ High Intellectual Potential and High Functioning Autism: Clinical and Neurophysiological Features in a Pediatric Sample
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9916188/ Exceptional abilities in autism: Theories and open questions
 * https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josp.12456 Neurodiversity, epistemic injustice, and the good human life
 * https://techinteach.com/understanding-the-giftedness-autism-connection/ Understanding the Giftedness-Autism Connection
 * https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcv2.12142 Categorical versus dimensional structure of autism spectrum disorder: A multi-method investigation
 * https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josp.12456 Neurodiversity, epistemic injustice, and the good human life
 * https://labs.la.utexas.edu/buss/files/2015/09/adaptations-for-exploitation.pdf Adaptations for Exploitation
 * https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1808153116 Developmental trajectory of social influence integration into perceptual decisions in children
 * https://blog.theautismsite.greatergood.com/peer-pressure/ ASD Kids Less Vulnerable to Peer Pressure
 * https://stimpunks.org/de/2023/06/03/stimpunks-guide-to-the-neurodiverse-ausgabe-5-neudefinition-der-autismusforschung-mit-monotropismus-und-dem-problem-der-doppelten-empathie/ Stimpunks Guide to the NeurodiVerse Ausgabe #5: Neudefinition der Autismusforschung mit Monotropismus und dem Problem der doppelten Empathie
 * https://www.bps.org.uk/psychologist/me-and-monotropism-unified-theory-autism Me and Monotropism: A unified theory of autism
 * https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/article-abstract/2810092 Persistence of Autism Spectrum Disorder From Early Childhood Through School Age
 * https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jcpp.13505 Time trends in autism diagnosis over 20 years: a UK population-based cohort study
 * https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aap8757 Analysis of shared heritability in common disorders of the brain
 * https://tendingpaths.wordpress.com/ Tending Paths
 * https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289616303324 High intelligence: A risk factor for psychological and physiological overexcitabilities
 * https://www.uniklinik-freiburg.de/psych/klinische-schwerpunkte/asperger-autismus/projekte.html UZAS-Freiburg Universitäres Zentrum Autismus Spektrum – Freiburg Projekte
 * https://www.moniquebotha.com/ Dr Monique Botha


 * https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1362361317726417 Associations between cooperation, reactive aggression and social impairments among boys with autism spectrum disorder
 * https://core.ac.uk/reader/186331930 Psychiatry Beyond the Brain: Externalism, Mental Health, and Autistic Spectrum Disorder
 * https://hennyk.com/2017/10/13/the-irony-of-susceptibility-to-manipulations-grooming-neurotypicals-for-social-ineptitude/ The Irony of Susceptibility to Manipulations: Grooming Neurotypicals for Social Ineptitude
 * https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jcpp.12703 Editorial Perspective: Neurodiversity – a revolutionary concept for autism and psychiatry
 * https://osf.io/preprints/osf/ft73y Development and Validation of a Novel Self-Report Measure of Monotropism in Autistic and Non-Autistic People: The Monotropism Questionnaire
 * https://molecularautism.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/2040-2392-4-20 Episodic memory retrieval for story characters in high-functioning autism

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8992921/ Our findings also raised the issue of how we can truly group people by neurotype in such studies. Participants self-reported their diagnostic status, yet there were several participants in the NT group whose experiences appeared to align with autistic and ND participants and who expressed doubt at their NT status. This issue has wider implications for any work, which attempts to make comparisons centered around neurotype, where we assume that people who do not have a diagnosis are “NT” (and rely on their self-report). Often, there are questions around online research as to how we can confirm the neurodivergent status of our participants (i.e., do we include screening measures alongside self-report); however, there is little focus on this issue in the opposite direction, how we confirm that a participant truly is “NT.” We do not have a solution to this problem, but think it worthy of acknowledgement.


 * https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631596/full
 * ; https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jcpp.13534
 * https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10091945/1/Frith_HappeFrith%20Changes%20in%20autism%20concept.Prefinal.pdf - gelesen
 * https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/13623613221142394
 * https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1001268/full
 * https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.946651/full
 * https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616664/full
 * https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcpp.13176 - gelesen
 * https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1093290/full
 * https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1085355/full
 * https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708375/full
 * https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcpp.13884
 * https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcpp.13867
 * https://karger.com/psp/article/52/3/153/285224/Arguments-for-a-Phenomenologically-Informed
 * https://karger.com/psp/article/56/3/220/841764/The-Human-Spectrum-A-Phenomenological-Enquiry
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9242721/
 * https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/camh.12663 - gelesen
 * https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/20502877.2016.1151256
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9310842/
 * https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/autism-human-connection-and-the-double-empathy-problem/

Non-autistic individuals, in autism or psychology research also called typically developing (TD) or neurotypical (NT), and in autism circles called allistic, are people not affected by autism. Having been studied in the form of non-autistic control groups in autism research for decades, the phenotype has begun to be the focus of research, now with autistics as the control group. Or it has been studied in exclusion of autistic individuals. The term allistic is preferred over neurotypical (short for "neurologically typical") to unambiguously mean "not autistic", as it excludes people with other neurodivergent diagnoses such as ADHD, dyslexia, or any form of neurocognitive or mental disorder.

As of 2023, 35 out of 36 children (97 percent) lack a diagnosis of autism and may therefore be regarded as non-autistic. With numbers of autism rising fast, the actual share of allistics in society is believed to be much lower. In 2019, research proposed a neurotypical prototype in contrast to individuals with autism or an autistic personality.

Findings
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.586171/full?fbclid=IwAR0sY5yeKggjzytwZ1ZBHkdBT5CasBAcRAgPF43qli0FmjXZePufcsSQpkQ :

Non-verbal and verbal communicative behaviors, including facial expressions, eye contact, postural mirroring, and tone play an important role in building rapport in people presumed to be neurotypical (Tickle-Degnen and Rosenthal, 1990); while not exhibiting these behaviors is related to poorer rapport (Richmond and McCroskey, 1995; Grahe and Bernieri, 1999; Hove and Risen, 2009). As difficulties with processing and expressing verbal and non-verbal social cues amongst autistic individuals have been well documented (Bottema-Beutel et al., 2019; Sasson et al., 2020), we might expect this to subsequently impact upon their development of rapport with others.

Applying a deficit model framework to paired interactions, autistic people should have the same difficulties interacting with autistic and non-autistic people (due to impairments in social communication) but difficulties would be compounded when two autistic people interact. A hypothesis based on this framework would predict that rapport between two non-autistic people would be highest, rapport between two autistic people would be lowest, and rapport between an autistic person and a non-autistic person would sit between these extremes.

Increasingly, deficit-based paradigms are challenged by ideas grounded in the social model of disability, which proposes that autistic difficulties emerge as a result of systemic barriers in society (Kapp et al., 2013).

Empirical support for the Double Empathy Problem is based on two strands of research. One area of research has explored non-autistic people’s difficulties in interacting with autistic people. Non-autistic people are less accurate at deciphering the facial expression of autistic people (Sheppard et al., 2016) and struggle to interpret autistic people’s mental states (Edey et al., 2016). Struggling to read autistic social cues is related to non-autistic people liking autistic people less (Alkhaldi et al., 2019), and non-autistic people are less willing to interact with autistic people (Sasson et al., 2017). Non-autistic people are also less likely to want to spend time or interact with autistic people than with non-autistic people (Morrison et al., 2020). These biases against autistic individuals are formed quickly by non-autistic people, and do not change with increased exposure (Sasson et al., 2017). Non-autistic people overestimate how egocentric autistic family members are (Heasman and Gillespie, 2018), while also overestimating the helpfulness of their own behaviors toward autistic people (Heasman and Gillespie, 2019b). Taken together, this body of research provides evidence that autistic social difficulties may be in part due to the perceptions of, and judgments made by, non-autistic people.

Though autistic people may perceive other autistic people as being more awkward, less attractive, and less socially warm than non-autistic people, autistic people still express interest in future interactions with other autistic people (DeBrabander et al., 2019; Morrison et al., 2020), suggesting that autistic people base their social judgments on fundamentally different criteria to non-autistic people.

Results showed that non-autistic pairs experienced higher self-rated rapport than autistic pairs, and both autistic and non-autistic pairs, and mixed pairs experienced lower rapport than both autistic pairs and non-autistic pairs. Regardless of individual neurotype, rapport is lower within mixed pairs compared with single neurotype pairs.

Additionally, examining the effect of the social context (i.e., whether in a matched or mixed-neurotype pair), showed that both autistic and non-autistic participants experienced lower rapport in mixed pairs. A lack of interaction with rater neurotype indicates that the lower rapport experienced in the mixed pairs is not driven by participants of a particular neurotype: both autistic and non-autistic participants had lower rapport within mixed pairs than in single neurotype pairs. However, given the small number of participants in each group when analyzing the data in this way (n = 12 each of autistic and non-autistic people in the mixed group), low statistical power may have contributed to the lack of a significant effect.

An exploratory comparison between participants’ own judgments of rapport and an observer’s ratings, suggests autistic participants’ self-rating of rapport are more in line with others’ ratings of rapport. There was a greater discrepancy between non-autistic participants’ estimates of their rapport with a partner compared with observers’ rating of the same social interaction.

More broadly, these findings fit with the wider psychological literature on in-group/out-group effects (e.g., Tajfel, 1979). Social identity theory suggests that inter-group behaviors are based on perceived group status differences. Thus, if someone identifies as being part of the same group as someone else (in the case of this research – autistic people with other autistic people, or non-autistic with other non-autistic people) they may be more motivated to achieve positive results (i.e., high self-rated rapport) (Tajfel et al., 1979). In contrast, perceiving someone as being of a different group to you (in the case of this study where diagnostic status was known within mixed pairs), participants may be less motivated to have positive interactions and high self-rated rapport. Though the effect of neurotype group identity on social behavior has not been explored, when neurotypical children are assigned to different arbitrary groups (e.g., green team, blue team), they show reduced imitation of those in their outgroup, just as autistic children show reduced imitation of neurotypical children (van Schaik and Hunnius, 2016). This presents the possibility that reduced social engagement exhibited by some autistic people may be explained by a lack of identification with people from other groups (i.e., non-autistic people).

A further finding is that autistic pairs’ self-rated rapport was significantly lower than non-autistic pairs self-rated rapport. There are several reasons why this may be the case. First, autistic pairs may experience lower rapport than non-autistic pairs due to differences in processing social information. Interpersonal interactions are a rich source of social information, and it is possible autistic individuals may be placing greater emphasis on some information more than others, or have their rapport limited by the volume of interactional processing going on (Murray et al., 2005). Second, due to well-documented autistic differences in social cognition (e.g., Sasson et al., 2020) autistic people may underestimate their rapport due to negative self-perception of their social skills (Hull et al., 2017) or lower self-perceived social competence (Jamison and Schuttler, 2015). Poor self-perception may also be the consequence of having a history of negative social interactions with individuals. Future research could ask autistic individuals to assess their overall level of social competence to see if this predicts self-rated rapport on a specific dyadic interaction. Third, autistic people could make rapport judgments on dimensions not assessed by the scale used in this study. Autistic people may have a distinctive way of interacting and building rapport with others (Heasman and Gillespie, 2019a), and may make social judgments using non-traditional criteria (Morrison et al., 2020), and thus their self-rated rapport may not be well assessed by the dimensions included in this scale. Finally, autistic people may be less impacted by social desirability bias than non-autistic people (Kirchner et al., 2012), who may inflate their self-rated rapport scores to be viewed positively by the experimenter (Krumpal, 2013).

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1745691620958010 :

If differences in interaction styles are viewed as impairments for autistic people, we must also consider these differences with nonautistic people as examples of impairments that may exacerbate difficulties in social interactions for autistic people.

The social-cognition assessments used in research are currently based on nonautistic social interactions and norms (Morrison et al., 2019). Although emerging research shows that autistic people can interact as efficiently as nonautistic people (although their interaction styles may not conform to nonautistic norms), this directly contradicts findings from social-cognitive-deficit accounts. It is therefore unsurprising that autistic people often perform significantly more poorly than nonautistic people on frequently used social-cognition measures. Furthermore, it is increasingly evident that performance of autistic people on measures of nonautistic social cognition are unlikely to accurately predict a person’s real-world functional and social skills (Sasson, Morrison, Kelsven, & Pinkham, 2020).


 * Non-autistics share information among themselves as effectively as autists do among themselves, but do so less effectively with non-autistics.
 * Medido por los estándares autistas, el cerebro "típico" se distrae con facilidad, es obsesivamente sociable y adolece de un déficit de atención al detaille y a la rutina. De ahí, que las personas en el espectro experimenten el munto neuritípico como un lagar de una impredictibilidad y un caos implacables que functiona a un volumen de ruido desmedido y replete de personas com poco respeto por el espacio personal.
 * We found that participants with ASD were equally likely—and in complex cases of deception even more likely—to deceive and detect deception, and learned deception at a faster rate. However, participants with ASD initially deceived less frequently, and were slower at detecting deception. These results suggest that people with ASD readily engage in deception but may do so through conscious and effortful reasoning about other people’s perspective. Mental-age-matched children with developmental delay and typically developing (TD) children were significantly better at lying to deceive the puppet than children with ASD.
 * Compared with HC, individuals with ASD were much more likely to reject the opportunity to earn ill gotten money by supporting a bad cause than were HCs. Computational modeling revealed that this resulted from heavily weighing benefits for themselves and the bad cause, suggesting that ASD participants apply a rule of refusing to serve a bad cause because they evaluate the negative consequences of their actions more severely.
 * Dinah Murray and colleagues (2005) posit that a monotropic mind has fewer interests aroused at any given time, withh each one being allocated attention at a high concentration this attention allocation strategy tends to apply to autistic people. In contrast, non-autistic individuals are hypothesised to be polytropic: they allocate attention at varying intensity levels to cover a broader range of interests, which may be coaroused at any given time.
 * Regardless of diagnostic group, all participants provided more negative judgments of autistic than neurotypical adolescents in the videos. These data indicate that, without being explicitly informed of a shared diagnosis, adolescents with autism spectrum disorder form negative first impressions of autistic adolescents that are similar to, or lower than, those formed by neurotypical peers. Findings indicated that autistic raters shared the TD tendency to evaluate autistic adults less favorably than TD adults, but these judgments did not reduce their social interest for interacting with autistic adults as they did for TD raters. Furthermore, informing raters of the diagnostic status of autistic adults did not improve first impressions for autistic raters as they did for TD raters, suggesting that autistic raters either already inferred their autism status when no diagnosis was provided or their impression formation is less affected by awareness of a person's diagnosis.

Allistic vs. neurotypical
The term "neurotypical" (an abbreviation of neurologically typical, sometimes NT) is a neologism that originated in the neurodiversity movement to label "people who do not have autistic-type brains", clarifying that this would exclude "autistic cousins" who are recognizably “autistic-like” but not necessarily autistic. Early uses of "NT" were often satirical, as in the Institute for the Study of the Neurologically Typical, but with time it came to be widely used unironically. It turned into a widely-used label for anyone who has a typical neurotype and fits into the norm of thinking patterns. Thus, neurotypicals were anyone without diagnoses of autistic, ADHD, dyslexia, anxiety, or any other condition that would be considered neurodivergent. Since then, the term has been adopted by both the neurodiversity movement and in the scientific community, although the National Autistic Society of the United Kingdom warned that the term "may not be applicable in, for example, the popular press."

People with any form of neurocognitive or mental disorder, whether congenital or acquired, have also sometimes been excluded from the neurotypical label, particularly in academic studies for specific disorders that use neurotypical control groups. In this sense, the term is now contrasted to neurodivergent, an umbrella term used to describe people with atypical mental and behavioral traits, such as mood, anxiety, dissociative, psychotic, personality, and eating disorders. Under the neurodiversity framework, these conditions are often referred to as "neurodivergencies", in an effort to move away from the medical model of disability (sometimes referred to in the neurodiversity community as the "pathology paradigm" ).

"Critiques of the Neurodiversity Movement", a 2020 review, raised two concerns regarding the term "neurotypical":
 * Many people who do not have an autism diagnosis have autistic traits (known by researchers as the "broad autism phenotype"), so there is no clear bimodal distribution separating people with and without autism. In reality there are not two distinct populations, one "neurotypical" and one "neurodivergent".
 * "Neurotypical" was a dubious construct, because there is nobody who could be considered truly neurotypical, and there is no such standard for the human brain.

= Rest =

Research updates

 * https://journals.sagepub.com/loi/AUT
 * https://www.frontiersin.org/search?query=autism&tab=top-results

Autism strengths
ORCID Icon Pages 589-603 Received 14 Aug 2021 Accepted 21 Oct 2021 Published online: 08 Nov 2021    Cite this article https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2021.1998589 CrossMark Logo
 * https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1362361320945556 First published online August 5, 2020 Parent-identified strengths of autistic youth Nick Warren https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8739-3668 [email protected], Bridges Eatchel, […], and Valerie D’Astous+3View all authors and affiliations Volume 25, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613209455
 * https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21582041.2021.1998589 Considering the Autistic advantage in qualitative research: the strengths of Autistic researchers Aimee Grant ORCID Icon & Helen Kara
 * https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/bjpsych-open/article/vive-la-difference-celebrating-and-supporting-autistic-psychiatrists-with-autistic-doctors-international/4A031BB9C3703EDA505894EE911624E3    BJPsych Open     >Volume 7 Supplement S1: Abstracts of the RCPsych V... Vive la difference! Celebrating and supporting autistic psychiatrists with autistic doctors international Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2021 Sue McCowan ,Sebastian C K Shaw,Mary Doherty,Bernadette Grosjean,Paula Blank and Malcolm Kinnear
 * https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpsy/article/PIIS2215-0366(20)30087-0/fulltext Correspondence| Volume 7, ISSUE 4, P306-307, April 2020 Autistic doctors: overlooked assets to medicine    Shirley Moore †    Malcolm Kinnear    Louise Freeman    Show footnotes Published:April, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30087-0
 * https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/13623613231158685 Innovation through neurodiversity: Diversity is beneficial Harriet Axbey https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1782-3930 [email protected], Nadin Beckmann https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7240-3963, […], and Catherine J Crompton https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5280-1596+2View all authors and affiliations Volume 27, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1177/136236132311586

Social, Mental health

 * https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/13623613221150375 Impact Factor: 5.2 / 5-Year Impact Factor: 6.2 First published online January 23, 2023 ‘Maybe we just seem like easy targets’: A qualitative analysis of autistic adults’ experiences of interpersonal violence Vicki Gibbs https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5058-5164 [email protected] and Elizabeth Pellicano https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7246-8003View all authors and affiliations Volume 27, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1177/136236132211503
 * https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/13623613231158959 Impact Factor: 5.2 / 5-Year Impact Factor: 6.2 First published online March 15, 2023 Factors influencing the mental health of autistic children and teenagers: Parents’ observations and experiences Suzanne Mukherjee https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9012-0369 [email protected] and Bryony Beresford https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0716-2902View all authors and affiliations Volume 27, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361323115895
 * EYES https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/13623613231162156 Impact Factor: 5.2 / 5-Year Impact Factor: 6.2 First published online March 30, 2023 Social attention patterns of autistic and non-autistic adults when viewing real versus reel people Beatriz López https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5621-6044 [email protected], Nicola Jean Gregory, and Megan Freeth https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0534-9095View all authors and affiliations Volume 27, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1177/136236132311621
 * EYES https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-49039-7 nature scientific reports articles    Published: 02 September 2019 Facetime vs. Screentime: Gaze Patterns to Live and Video Social Stimuli in Adolescents with ASD     R. B. Grossman1, E. Zane1, J. Mertens1 & T. Mitchell2 Scientific Reports volume 9, Article number: 12643 (2019) Cite this article

Attention, focus and reasoning

 * https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0273229709000410 Developmental Review Volume 30, Issue 1, March 2010, Pages 52-73 Developmental Review A review of methods in the study of attention in autism Author links open overlay panel, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.12.003
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4860198/ J Autism Dev Disord. 2016; 46: 2115–2125. Published online 2016 Mar 9. doi: 10.1007/s10803-016-2742-4 PMCID: PMC4860198 PMID: 26960339 Reasoning on the Autism Spectrum: A Dual Process Theory Account Mark Brosnan,corresponding author Marcus Lewton, and Chris Ashwin Author information Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer
 * https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0028393203002392?via%3Dihub Neuropsychologia Volume 42, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 467-481 Neuropsychologia Do high functioning persons with autism present superior spatial abilities? Author links open overlay panel, , , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.08.015

Autistic burnout
Samuel RC Arnold https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2900-223X [email protected], Julianne M Higgins https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4198-7684, […], and Julian N Trollor https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7685-2977+3View all authors and affiliations Volume 27, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361322114741 Samuel RC Arnold https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2900-223X [email protected], Julianne M Higgins https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4198-7684, […], and Julian N Trollor https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7685-2977+3View all authors and affiliations Volume 27, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1177/136236132211474
 * https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/13623613221147410 mpact Factor: 5.2 / 5-Year Impact Factor: 6.2 First published online January 13, 2023 Confirming the nature of autistic burnout
 * https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/13623613221147401 Impact Factor: 5.2 / 5-Year Impact Factor: 6.2 First published online January 13, 2023 Towards the measurement of autistic burnout

To sort
create shared understanding
 * https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1750946721001392 Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders Volume 89, November 2021, 101864 Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders “It feels like holding back something you need to say”: Autistic and Non-Autistic Adults accounts of sensory experiences and stimming
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6728747/ Autism. 2019 Oct; 23(7): 1782–1792. Published online 2019 Feb 28. doi: 10.1177/1362361319829628 PMCID: PMC6728747 PMID: 30818970 ‘People should be allowed to do what they like’: Autistic adults’ views and experiences of stimming Steven K Kapp,1 Robyn Steward,2 Laura Crane,2 Daisy Elliott,1 Chris Elphick,1 Elizabeth Pellicano,2,3 and Ginny Russell1
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2677592/ Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 May 27; 364(1522): 1377–1383. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0337 PMCID: PMC2677592 PMID: 19528020 Talent in autism: hyper-systemizing, hyper-attention to detail and sensory hypersensitivity Simon Baron-Cohen,* Emma Ashwin, Chris Ashwin, Teresa Tavassoli, and Bhismadev Chakrabarti
 * https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10803-022-05443-z Home Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Eye Gaze in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Review of Neural Evidence for the Eye Avoidance Hypothesis     Original Paper    Open access    Published: 04 February 2022    volume 53, pages 1884–1905 (2023)
 * https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0268069 Autism-spectrum traits in neurotypicals predict the embodiment of manipulation knowledge about object concepts: Evidence from eyetracking    Charles P. Davis,     Inge-Marie Eigsti,     Roisin Healy,     Gitte H. Joergensen,     Eiling Yee PLOS    Published: July 25, 2022    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268069
 * https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aur.1962 Can you spot a liar? Deception, mindreading, and the case of autism spectrum disorder David M. Williams, Toby Nicholson, Catherine Grainger, Sophie E. Lind, Peter Carruthers First published: 27 April 2018 https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1962
 * https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/aut.2019.0023 Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Toward Autistic Adults Cheryl L. Dickter Joshua A. Burk, Janice L. Zeman , and Sara C. Taylor Published Online:10 Jun 2020https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2019.0023
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4636978/ Psychol Sci. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 Nov 1. Published in final edited form as: Psychol Sci. 2015 Nov; 26(11): 1693–1705. Published online 2015 Sep 18. doi: 10.1177/0956797615595607 PMCID: PMC4636978 NIHMSID: NIHMS702487 PMID: 26386014 Implicit Social Biases in People with Autism Elina Birmingham,1,* Damian Stanley,2,* Remya Nair,2 and Ralph Adolphs2
 * https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00376/full Front. Psychiatry, 04 June 2019 Sec. Social Neuroscience Volume 10 - 2019 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00376 Do Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorders Help Other People With Autism Spectrum Disorders? An Investigation of Empathy and Helping Motivation in Adults With Autism Spectrum Disorder Hidetsugu Komeda1† Hirotaka Kosaka2,3† Toru Fujioka3 Minyoung Jung3 Hidehiko Okazawa3,4*
 * https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.947653/full
 * https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1264516/full
 * https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/90098/1/Heasman_Neurodivergent-intersubjectivity_Published.pdf Brett Heasman and Alex Gillespie, Neurodivergent intersubjectivity: distinctive features of how autistic people

However, beginning with a stated "double empathy problem" between autistics and non-autistics in 2012, researchers have increasingly called to reframe autistic social deficits as interaction and communicative challenges between the two groups. Autistics were found to be met with less willingness for interaction by non-autistics, based on thin slice judgments.

While there is much work to be done to explore these issues across multiple disciplines, the concept of the double empathy problem has the potential to aid a reframing of autism itself from a social communication disorder to a description of a broad range of developmental differences and embodied experiences and how they play out in specific social and cultural contexts. If this were so, it would lead to a radical change to current diagnostic criteria.


 * https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1225152/full
 * ; https://osf.io/ft73y/ Development and Validation of a Novel Self-Report Measure of Monotropism in Autistic and Non-Autistic People: The Monotropism Questionnaire;    Valeria Garau Aja Louise Murray Richard Woods Nick Chown Sonny Hallett Fergus Murray Rebecca Wood Sue Fletcher-Watson
 * https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10803-017-3166-5
 * https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1362361320919286
 * Morrison K. E., DeBrabander K. M., Jones D. R., Faso D. J., Ackerman R. A., Sasson N. J. (2019). Outcomes of real-world social interaction for autistic adults paired with autistic compared to typically developing partners. Autism. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361319892701
 * Gernsbacher M. A., Stevenson J. L., Dern S. (2017). Specificity, contexts, and reference groups matter when assessing autistic traits. PLOS ONE, 12(2), Article e0171931. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0171931
 * Milton D. E. M., Heasman B., Sheppard E. (2018). Double empathy. In Volkmar F. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of autism spectrum disorders (pp. 1–8). Springer. https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-1-4614-6435-8_102273-1
 * First published online October 20, 2022, The ‘double empathy problem’: Ten years on, Damian Milton, Emine Gurbuz, and Beatriz LópezView all authors and affiliations, Volume 26, Issue 8, https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221129123
 * First published online September 30, 2021, Seeing and inviting participation in autistic interactions, Hanne De Jaegher, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7273-6410 [email protected]View all authors and affiliations, Volume 60, Issue 5, https://doi.org/10.1177/13634615211009627
 * Sasson N. J., Faso D. J., Nugent J., Lovell S., Kennedy D. P., Grossman R. B. (2017). Neurotypical peers are less willing to interact with those with autism based on thin slice judgments. Scientific Reports, 7, 40700. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28145411/
 * Williams G. L., Wharton T., Jagoe C. (2021). Mutual (mis)understanding: Reframing autistic pragmatic ‘impairments’ using relevance theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 616664. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616664/full
 * Camus L., Macmillan K., Rajendran G., Stewart M. (2022, May 10). ‘I too, need to belong’: Autistic adults’ perspectives on misunderstandings and well-being. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/5mysh
 * Chen Y. L., Senande L. L., Thorsen M., Patten K. (2021). Peer preferences and characteristics of same-group and cross-group social interactions among autistic and non-autistic adolescents. Autism, 25(7), 1885–1900. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13623613221129123#bibr18-13623613221129123
 * https://sites.google.com/port.ac.uk/autismemploymenttoolkit/bps-seminar-series?authuser=0 + https://port.cloud.panopto.eu/Panopto/Pages/Viewer.aspx?id=05db62b6-0634-402c-86f3-ae5b014ea30f
 * https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33393101/ Mitchell P., Sheppard E., Cassidy S. (2021). Autism and the double empathy problem: Implications for development and mental health. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 39(1), 1–18.