User:Sggiraffe/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Tupac Enrique Acosta

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

This article was chosen because it was not created, so my partner and I created it. It matters because Tupac Enrique Acosta was influential in many indigenous movements and passed recently, so it is important the work done in his lifetime gets recognition on a platform like wikipedia.

Evaluate the article
There is really no lead section being the article is so new, so this part needs a lot of work. The minimal content is good, however much more information is needed. The content is up to date and relevant, however there needs to be more. The content does represent and provide knowledge on a historically underrepresented group. The links and sources are there, reliable, and work, there does need to be more sources though. I think the article is written well and doesn't have grammatical errors, the organization needs help because everything is really scattered as of now. The article does not have images. The talk page is also not there being the article is new. The article is overall poor, and poorly-developed. It can pretty much be improved on in every category.