User:Sgonz163/Nadema Agard/Yelly1 Peer Review

General info
Subject: Nadema Agard

Username: Sgonz163

Link to draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sgonz163/Nadema_Agard/Bibliography?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_bibliography

Sections
There is an introductory sentence to the bibliography. It demonstrates that the wikiarticle is going to be about Nadema Agard, a native american, who does a variety of jobs and works. There is information on other sections of the article, but most of them are in bullet point form (Education). There is not description of the artworks but its a rough draft so it's understandable. There isn't any awards/honors, exhibitions, collections, references, external link, or see also headings. Its fine if there isn't any info about the artist concerning some of the missing topics mentioned since it might not be applicable/hard to find information on.

Content
The content added to the article is relevant to the artist and what she does. It is up-to-date since the information is mostly from the artists website. There is quite a few things missing from the article that I mentioned above.

Tone and Balance
Content is neutral. I don't see any heavy bias towards a particular position and there isn't an attempt to persuade the reader to favor one position over the other.

Sources and References
I do not know if I looked at the right article, but you need to add more sources. I only see one --the link itself does not work but the one underneath the writing "This is where you..." does. However, it is not cited correctly. You should also have a reference section where you have you have all the sources that you used and an external link section (only the artist's blog goes here). A see also heading is also needed for the wiki page where other info that is relevant to your artist is not talked about in depth in your article (ex: the artist tribe/heritage, the type of medium she uses, etc.). Make sure you use other sources that does not come from the artists blog. You need to find secondary reliable sources about your artist. Last note for the sources and references: add footnotes.

Organization
Not sure how I should word this, but the organization/format of your wiki article should be clear. You should Add headings to your wiki article. Like make sure your heading and subheading are larger than the body of text and that they appear in the table of contents that it is easier to navigate to. It will also be much easier to read if there was a clear distinction between the heading, subheading, and the body paragraph. I know it's not done yet, but the education section would look much better  written out in full sentences and not in bullet points.

Overall Evaluation
Right now, the wikipage doesn't look reliable due to the formatting and the lack of sources, but it is understandable since it is only the rough draft. However, you did a really good job at keeping a neutral tone and just sticking to the facts (skimmed it). I feel like, depending on how famous your artist is, there is a good amount on the bibliography.