User:Shaikha19/sandbox

Article Evaluation
=== Article: Korean Horror === Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?


 * Everything in the article is relevant to the article topic. There was no content that was distracting.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?


 * The article contains a lot of valuable information that dates back to the 1960s. However, it also has content about modern Korean Horror and directors.

What else could be improved?


 * I feel like more information can be added about current K-Horror themes and how they reflect Korean realities, culture, etc.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biassed toward a particular position?


 * The article is neutral. There are no heavily biased claims in the article as it covers realistic and fact-checked information about K-Horror and its history.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?


 * There are viewpoints that seem overrepresented (not quite) simply because other viewpoints are underrepresented. Such overrepresented viewpoints are the recurring themes of seeking revenge and the Female Ghost in Korean horror films. These are all true. However, I feel like modern K-horror themes are underrepresented.

Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?


 * Yes, the article is cited well and almost all of the links work. However, a few of the links take you to pages that are in full Korean (with no English option) and pages that are only accessible through college log in portals. Although they were only a few links, they could have been beneficial yet I could not access them myself.

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?


 * Again, a few of the links take you to unaccessible pages due to language or sign in portals. However, the rest of the sources are neutral. There is one link that may seem biased. It is an article pondering why K-horror only has female ghosts. However, it asks the truth seeing as almost all of the ghosts in K-horror are females. However, they also did not consider K-horror films that do not have females as lead ghosts.

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?


 * There are no conversations happening behind the scenes.

How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?


 * The article is a part of WikiProject Film, WikiProject Horror , and WikiProject Korea

How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?


 * It focuses more on themes in K-horror films, whereas in class, we focused more on stylistic aspects of movies. The article does not discuss any stylistic aspects in K-horror movies.