User:Shaina390/sandbox

Introduction
Shadism is defined as the discrimination of individuals based on skin-tone. This form of intraracial and interracial discrimination is common in the African and Caribbean, Hispanic, Indian, Asian, and Aboriginal cultures. Shadism is traditionally deemed to affect women more strongly than men, due to the influences of European beauty standards and its effect on self-esteem. However, the framework of shadism being a gendered practice has often been challenged in more modern times, as there is now evidence that it affects men's self-esteem as well. .

=Cultural Implications=

African and Caribbean Community: Historical Background
In the black community, shadism began during the era of slavery. . Due to sexual contact between black slaves and white Europeans, a large population of mulatto or mixed-race individuals were produced. . The biracial children of slave owners were often given preferential treatment, obtaining skilled household positions, in comparison to slaves with darker skin. They also received better healthcare. . The occupational and health advantages to being biracial is often alluded to when describing a hierarchy of skin tone within the black community, and the connection between lighter skin and privilege. . It is also possible that whites preferred blacks who looked ‘closer to white,’ and rewarded them with better jobs and better healthcare, creating a system of privilege.

African and Caribbean Community: Cultural Repercussions
In 2010, sociologist Dr. JeffriAnne Wilder of the University of North Florida published a study to deconstruct the modern language and notions surrounding skin tone within the black community. This study is unique because few studies have analyzed whether or not there has been a change in attitudes towards differences in skin tone as time has progressed. This study is based on a history of individuals with lighter skin being allowed more privilege in terms of education, healthcare and employment than those with darker skin. These allowances created historical binaries and separations that young people today are still feeling the ramifications of. It affects how they perceive themselves, as well as how others perceive them. Wilder’s study showed that there are 40 distinct terms that the participants commonly use to describe others or themselves in their everyday lives. Most of the terms were easily recognized by all other women in the group. Nine could also be found on the list that Parrish had compiled in the 1940’s. Nearly 50% of the terms were for females with light skin. Most of these terms were positive and indicated attractiveness. However, some such as house n*igga were less appropriate, while still very common, indicating an ongoing slave mentality within the black community. When asked to describe women with light skin, participants responded by with words such as “trustworthy, amiable, nonthreatening, and comfortable”; light skin was also commonly connected to beauty. Because of this, women with light skin are also associated with “conceit and arrogance”. In contrast, the groups described women with dark skin as being “loud, suspicious, unattractive, and less intelligent”. Most terms for women with dark skin were offensive, and reinforce that negative controlling images of women with dark skin are still prevalent. Some names within all skin tones are food related, such as caramel for vanilla for light skin, medium skin, and chocolate for dark skin. These terms further sexualize black women. Another interesting finding is that while there are a large range of names for those with light and dark skin, there are a significantly less for those with medium skin tones. “Light skin…is viewed as the ideal colour, holding the most value in the black community”. Internalized racism and colourism shapes the beliefs that people have on an individual’s behaviours and attractiveness. The perception is that girls with light skin are pretty, while girls with dark skin are ‘ghetto’.

Hispanic Community: Historical Background
This began in the colonial era, when Europeans with light skin, in large numbers, became the dominant members of society after expeditions to explore foreign lands. The dominant European class was able to enforce laws and social norms upon the populations they colonized, which had a long-lasting impact, including a high-frequency of depression associated with having darker skin. Within the Hispanic community, there is a strong correlation between depression and darker skin, “regardless of the person’s education, family income, or command of the English language”. Due to the American colonization of many Hispanic peoples, many Hispanic Americans have “internalized light skin as an ideal point of reference because they were powerless to contest the influence of the dominant mainstream population.” Skin tone often affects perceptions of attractiveness, and therefore whom Hispanic Americans decide to marry.'

Hispanic Community: Cultural Repercussions
Much like peoples of Caribbean and African decent, those of Hispanic descent may experience how efforts to assimilate are often associated with having light skin. Within the Hispanic community, “Dark skin is regarded by the various institutions as an obstacle that bars Hispanic Americans from fully assimilating. W.E.B. DuBois was one of the first academics in the United States to recognize the dilemma that Hispanics face when trying to assimilate into mainstream society. Dubois referred to it as “double consciousness”. Double Consciousness implies the importance of the idea of light skin, and the requirement that “anyone with dark skin …assume a passive social demeanor in order not to offend further the light-skinned mainstream population.”. Many members of the Hispanic community place great importance on mainstream culture, at the expense of their own culture. This allows them to better assimilate into mainstream society, and the benefits that come with that assimilation. Some scholars have referred to these Hispanic Americans as “coconuts,” as they are “brown on the outside and white on the inside”.

In an effort to combat these obstacles, many Hispanic Americans suffer from what is called “bleaching syndrome”. “…Because degree of assimilation closely correlates with the phenotype of the mainstream population (i.e., skin color), light skin has emerged as one of the most critical ideals relative to degree of assimilation (Reuter, 1969). It is acted out socially by Hispanic Americans in their use of light skin as a point of reference to assure full assimilation into the mainstream of society.”. Historically, this bleaching syndrome began when Hispanic Americans with darker skin began using “beauty creams” that made their skin lighter. According to Hall, “The syndrome is applicable wherever domination exists. When applied to Hispanic Americans, its existence is substantiated in a most dramatic fashion, for they as a group have had to internalize skin-color ideals that are often radically inconsistent with the outward appearance of a significant number of their brethren”. It is important to note that not all Hispanic Americans suffer bleaching syndrome.

Indian Community: Historical Background
The desire for lighter skin within the Indian community is the result of colonial influences, and the resulting standard of beauty set by European women. It is customary for brides to wash their faces with turmeric and yogurt to lighten their skin before their wedding.

Indian Community: Cultural Repercussions
In India, dark skin often leads to social stigmas such as name-calling and exclusion. The teasing term kali is often used to refer to someone as “blacky,” while those with lighter skin are commonly referred to as “wheatish."  Some Indian mothers prevent their daughters from playing outside in the sun, for fear of them becoming darker with a tan.

One biggest impact of having dark skin is the fact that it limits marital prospects. There is a double standard: In Indian society, while women are expected to have fair skin, the skin tone of the male does not matter. A prevalent occurrence in Indian advertisements for skin-lightening creams is the man falling in love with the woman based on how light and glowing her skin tone is, and being unattracted to her if her skin is darker.

India represents one of the world's largest markets for skin-lightening creams, often termed “fairness creams.”

Some of the advertisements relate light skin with parental approval, success in the workplace, and increased self-confidence. It is claimed that certain professions such as secretarial and flight attendant positions are “reserved for fair girls.”  However, the most prevalent theme in the advertisements is successful romantic relationships, especially proposals for marriage and sustained attractiveness to her husband and youthful appearance as the woman ages. In Indian films, heroines have fair skin, which lends to the idea that fair skin equates to beauty and confidence. Some products such as Ponds' Real Glow skin cream, are marketed to teenaged girls. In one advertisement for Fair & Lovely, actress and former Miss World Aishwarya Rai Bachchan is complimented by her sister on her lightened skin tone; She tells her sister that she should also use Fair & Lovely to obtain a similar glow. This advertisement is important because Aishwarya Rai Bachchan is often regarded as one of the most beautiful women in the world. Her claiming that her light skin tone came from a skin-lightening cream would have an immense effect.

Asian Community: HIstorical Background
In China, there exists “a culture that prizes pallid complexion as a traditional sign of feminine beauty unscathed by the indignities of manual labor.” “…Fair skin conceals a thousand flaws’” is a famous Chinese saying.

Asian Community: Cultural Repercussions
In Asian cultures, importance is placed on having fair skin, with unwillingness to allow oneself to tan being a common practice. Some women go to great lengths to keep their skin fair, including wearing face masks when out in the sun. A 2012 New York Times article by Dan Levin investigates this issue. Solar protection gear has become a very successful industry in China, catering to a culture that prizes fair skin as a demonstration of feminine beauty. These face masks are in high demand in China, due to concerns over quality control, the government ordered business to halt sales. While some women wear face masks made from the same stretchy material as bathing suits to conceal themselves from the sun, others use full wet-suits, sun protection gloves or parasols. Skin-lightening creams are also common, with names such as Snow White and White Swan, which promise the user “a natural-looking aristocratic hue.” One woman, Yao Wenhua, who dons a mask during her visits to the beach, said, “A woman should always have fair skin. Otherwise people will think you’re a peasant.”

Aboriginal Community: Historical Background
Blood Quantum Laws are laws that favour certain individuals within the Aboriginal community, based on the percentage of Native blood they have. This old government practice is attached to notions of shadism, as many believe that the more your skin tone and features resemble a Caucasian, the less pure your ancestry, and therefore the less valid your experience as a part of that ethnic group.

Aboriginal Community: Cultural implications
The term ‘half-breed’ is commonly used in differently cultures, especially the Aboriginal culture, to refer to someone of mixed heritage. In the Aboriginal community, it is often used as a derogatory insult to describe those who are less than one half Aboriginal. It is often used to make a person feel less racially or culturally pure than someone else.

Plains Cree author, playwright and comedian Dawn Dumont wrote an article as a guest contributor for an online magazine entitled Media Indigena: Interactive Indigenous Insight. Her piece entitled 'The Politics of Skin Colour' chronicled the problem of internalized racism in the Native community, where value is placed on having lighter skin, and darker skin is seen by some as inferior and unattractive.

=Studies on Shadism=

Many important studies have been conducted to examine the enduring effects of Shadism. In 1983, Relethford et. al. set out to study diabetes in the Mexican-American population. Part of their research involved using a spectrophotometer to measure skin colour in subjects. Unintentionally, they were able to use their research to find other social correlations within the Hispanic community that were connected to skin tone. They found that the lighter the skin of the subject, the more affluent their lifestyle. In 1987, Arce, Murgia and Frisbie discovered a correlation between higher education and income levels for Hispanics, to light skin. They also found that Hispanics with darker skin reported higher incidences of discrimination than Hispanics with lighter skin. This was because those with darker skin were often deemed “more sinister and less attractive” on the basis of skin tone.' In September of 2011, Pennsylvania’s Villanova University conducted a study that showed that women with lighter skin tones were sentenced to jail terms approximately 12% shorter than women with darker skin tones. In May of 2006, the American Economic Review published several studies on the connection between skin tone and salary in the United States. ‘Skin-Tone Effects Among Africans: Perceptions and Reality’ conducted by Joni Hersch found that  there is a direct correlation between skin tone and educational attainment, but not necessarily a correlation between skin tone and wages. While there is a significant gap between how much those with light skin and dark skin make, those with medium skin tones earned the least amount. Arthur Goldsmith, Darrick Hamilton and William Darity Jr.’s study ‘Shades of Discrimination: Skin Tone and Wages’ found that blacks with light skin earned the most, followed by those with medium toned skin, with those with dark skin earning the least. This study found that whites earned the most overall

White Standard of Beauty
Many non-caucasian cultures have been conditioned to conform to a ‘white standard of beauty’ which criticizes not only non-caucasian skin tones, but also certain shapes of eyes, lips, bodies, and different hair types. Maya Poran, a professor of Psychology at Montclair State University in New Jersey, researched perceptions of beauty and cultural standards of beauty, as held by Latina, black and white women. In their own definition of beauty, of the three groups, black women were most likely to mention a white standard of beauty, while Latina women sometimes did, and white women rarely did. Black women were most likely to mention race in their discussion of the standards of beauty, while white women were most likely to mention beauty in terms of male or female. Latina women were equally likely to mention both race and gender.

=Skin Lightening Products=

Shadism is a problem even in racially homogenous societies. In India, Vaseline launched an app that lightens the skin of the user in their photos. This app was used as a promotional tool for Vaseline’s range of men’s skin-lightening creams. This line was initiated as a direct result of the enormous skin bleaching market that India has. India represents one of the world's largest markets for skin-lightening creams, often termed “fairness creams.”  Fairness creams are made from niacinamide, which limits distribution of melanin, the skin's pigment. The chemical process to create niacinamide was patented in 1971 by Hindustan Lever. Many large companies have launched skin-lightening products in India, including: Vaseline, L'Oreal, Revlon, Nivea, Ponds, Lancome, Elizabeth Arden, Yve St. Laurent, and Estee Lauder. Ads for these crèmes are shown in heavy ration on television in India, especially for the brand wildly successful brand Fair & Lovely. The advertisements promise lightened skin tone, and resulting “natural beauty” as they begin to work within four to six weeks of use. Some products such as Emami Fair Pearls Cream claim to be made using natural products including herbs and real pearls, while they are actually made from chemicals, which lighten the skin.

In 2014, Nigerian pop star Dencia launched her own brand of pigmentation removing skin cream called Whitenicious. In advertising the product, the pop star appeared in ads with noticeably lighter skin, holding bottles of her product. When questioned about her lighter appearance since launching the product, Dencia said “I was never that dark in real life…And guess what? I don’t even care because [critics] are bringing me business.”. During an interview with Ebony magazine, Dencia says that it is not in her control if customers use Whitenicious as a skin bleaching cream on their entire bodies.

Jamaican singer Vybz Kartel was highly criticized after undergoing skin-bleaching treatments in 2010. Of the controversy, he said: “I feel comfortable with black people lightening their skin. It’s tantamount to white people getting a suntan.” Of ‘cake soap,’ a product used to lighten the user’s skintone, Kartel said:  “When black women stop straightening their hair and wearing wigs and weaves, when white women stop getting lip and butt injections and implants…then I’ll stop using the ‘cake soap’ and we’ll all live naturally ever after.”  In 2011, Kartel launched his own line of ‘skin brightening’ soaps and creams in the Caribbean.

=Popular Culture=

Hip Hop Culture
In the music videos of rap and R&B artists, there is a strong preference for female dancers and models with light skin. In 2013, while shooting a music video in Ghana, Senegalese singer Akon and Nigerian rapper WizKid's music video producer rejected several black models with dark skin, saying that they were only looking for biracial women with lighter skin. Allegedly, the producer even asked the rejected models if they could reccommend women with light skin for the shoot, because of a fast approaching deadline for casting.

The song 'Right Above' by Lil Wayne features the lyrics, "Beautiful black woman, I bet that b*tch look better in red." Red is a term used within the black community to describe a person with light skin. Lil Wayne, a father of four children with four different women, has been widely quoted as saying that he chooses the mothers of his children based on skin tone, to ensure that the children will inherit a certain skin tone and hair type.

In a widely criticized July 2008 podcast with Lip Service, rapper Yung Berg referred to women with dark skin as "dark butts." On his preference for women, he stated, "I'm kinda racist. I don't really like dark butts too much.  It's rare that I do like dark butts.  Like really rare.  It's like, no darker than me.  No darker than me." Yung Berg later apologized for his comments, saying that his mother has dark skin, and he did not intend to insult.

Twitter: #Teamlightskin vs. #Teamdarkskin
Within the black community, the has emerged on Twitter virtual teams based on skin tone, called #Teamdarkskin and #Teamlightskin. These two groups would ridicule and criticize each other, based on skin tone. Inspired by the Twitter phenomenon club promoters in Ohio came under fire for hosting a party on January 21st 2011 with the theme "Light Skin vs. Dark Skin." In August 2012, Youtuber Tre Melvin criticized the practice of cyber-shadism in a viral video entitled [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mb2TZ9xdiCs 58. #TeamLightskin vs. #TeamDarkskin].

Photoshop, Magazines, and Advertisements
In 2010, Elle magazine was accused of lightening actress Gabourey Sidibe’s skin when she appeared in their magazine. Elle responded by saying that “nothing out of the ordinary” had been done to Sidibe’s photos. In 2009, make-up company L’Oreal faced accusations that they lightened singer and actress Beyonce’s skin in their ads, a claim that L’Oreal denied.

In 2013, Vanity Fair magazine was accused of lightening the skin tone of Acadamy-Award nominee Lupita Nyong’o when she was featured in their publication. Previously, Vanity Fair had been accused of lightening the complexions of Kerry Washington, Gabourey Sidibe, and Beyonce.

Documentary: 'Dark Girls' (2012)
The 2012 documentary Dark Girls debuted at the International Black Film Festival in Nashville, Tennessee. The film examines the day-to-day experiences of black women in America, who have darker skin tones. A nine-minute long preview of the film was released in May 2011, and went viral on black entertainment blogs, as well as social media websites. The film examines the discrimination that black women with dark skin often face, as well as the historical roots of shadism.

Documentary: 'Club Native' (2008)
Club Native, directed by Tracey Deer, is a Canadian documentary that was released in 2008. The film examines issues of Aboriginal identity, particularly Blood Quantum Laws, which favour certain individuals based on the percentage of Native blood they have. The film won two 2009 Gemini Awards. One for Best Documentary Writing, and another for Canada Award Best Canadian Multi-Cultural Program.

=Shadism as a Gendered Concept=

Mark Hill, a former professor of Sociology at The Pennsylvania State University conducted a study to investigate the possible link between skin tone, and gendered perceptions of physical attractiveness. Hill found that women with lighter skin were 11.6 times more likely to be rated attractive than the darkest women in his study, while the odds for men were just 1.6 times.

Joni Hersch, a professor of Law and Economics at Vanderbilt University, conducted a study published by The American Economic Review in 2006 on the connection between skin tone, educational attainment and wages. This study was based on the historical framework that skin tone influences educational attainment, and therefore affects the individual’s later occupational outcomes. This framework exists due to those with lighter skin being more strongly integrated into predominantly white educational and work environments, giving them better educational and occupational outcomes in the future. The information Hersch used was separated by gender, to examine if shadism is a gendered concept, economically affecting one gender more than another. Hersch found that the employment rate for females with very dark skin tones was drastically lower than for women with lighter skin. The data shows no significance in the rate of employment for men based on skin tone. There was limited evidence that skin tone affects wages. Data from the National Survey of Black Americans (NSBA) showed that men with darker skin earn approximately 20% less than men with light skin. For both men and women, respondents with light skin had the highest hourly pay. The results indicate that there is an effect between skin tone and educational attainment, with a less convincing influence of skin tone on wages. When asked whether they believe they are treated differently by black people or white people based on their skin tone, respondents with light skin tones believe that they are treated dramatically better by white individuals than blacks with darker skin tones are. They also believe that other black people treat them somewhat better. Lighter skin tone may influence economic gains, because it often provides access to better schools and subsequently allows them to obtain better jobs. According to Hersch, “Lighter skin tone is clearly associated with higher employment rates for women and higher educational attainment for both women and men.”.

Research shows that some Hispanic women born in the United States are not as affected by the ideals associated with light skin as many Hispanic males are. This is unusual, as women are often valued based on physical appearance, as opposed to men being valued based on their salary. A possible reason for this shift may be the Hispanic American man being influenced by the mainstream population putting importance on men being breadwinners.'

In India, fairness creams have also recently began being targeted towards men. In India, Vaseline’s released a line of men’s skin-lightening creams as the direct result of India's profitable skin bleaching market.