User:Shalin2346/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
I am evaluating "Economy of Atlanta" from wikipedia.

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I had visited Atlanta recently and I wanted to explore further on how the economy of Atlanta is thriving and sustaining. The article also gives a content overview of what topics it will cover on the content tab. The lead of the article focuses on the economic features of Atlanta, primarily the presence of large companies and their impact on the

Evaluate the article
Yes, the article includes a lead to begin the article. The introduction is robust and very informative. The article also mentions the description of what the author is going to mention throughout the article as mentioned in the contents section. The content section is descriptive and is completed with sectors of Atlanta business that contribute to the emerging economy. The lead does not reflect the information which is not mentioned in the article. The lead is concise and it gives a good overview of what the author is going to write further.

The contents of the article are very relevant to the topic. The article is categorized into different types of dominant sectors, finance, healthcare, and biomedical common manufacturing, medical communications, and logistics. These features of an economy are crucial to determine its monetary power. Even within several sectors, this article mainly emphasizes the importance of trade transportation and utilities as it contributes to around 530,000 employees. The sectors are roughly out of date because these statistics reflect the economy nearly a decade ago. Taken on Atlanta has been very dynamic and the figures are subject to change. The content of the article has covered significant sectors of Atlanta and does not seem to miss dominant sectors at all. From mentioning the presence of the Federal Bank to CNN center, this article has successfully Incorporated major economic contributions from major corporations as well. This article does not relate to the historically underrepresented population because this article is primarily talking about the economy of Atlanta which is independent of population division and subdivision. This article also seems to include significant sectors that have added employment value and GDP value to the economy of Atlanta.

This article is neutral and does not take any side of any party of any kind. There are no claims that appear heavily biased towards a particular position as well. The sectors that are in minority division to contribute to the Atlanta Economy are mining and logging and information. These sectors are unbiased mentions of the reflection of Atlanta's economy. This article also does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another as the economic sectors of Atlanta are thoroughly divided into the classes which are unbiased and reflect the true economy of Atlanta.

The facts in the article are backed up by reliable secondary sources of information as all the key points are linked to external websites and those websites are unbiased and do not favor one party over another. The sources are not current since the figures for Dominant sectors were written nearly a decade ago. The sources are written by a diverse spectrum of authors since the Wikipedia pages are written by different authors from different backgrounds. Moreover, the writer has also given external links to other news sources and articles that back up their information. There are multiple unbiased and neutral articles linked with this article. However, there are many Wikipedia pages linked with this article that could be edited by another user. This article has a significant reliable source backing its claims but some sources can be further scrutinized upon. The links work for specific source articles.

The article is well written with a thorough insight into the economy of Atlanta. It is concise, clear, and easy to read. The words are not ambiguous and the meanings are easily conveyed to the audience. I do not see any errors in grammar or language structure in this article as well. Its meaning is simple to comprehend and analyze. Yes, the contents are categorized by the sectors that have the highest share of the economy of Atlanta and the contents are well-structured and comprehensive.

The article has mentioned pictures and illustrations that match the content of the article. The articles are also well-captioned. The pictures in the article, the illustration help the user enhance understanding of the topic. All the images are here to Wikipedia's copyright regulations as they are property sourced along with being informative and illustrative to the subject content. The images are also visually appealing but not the highlight of the article. The images reflect the meaning of the topic written down and do not overwhelm the audience.

The article is informative and concise. The writer has illustrated the economy of Atlanta with much detail by dividing the influence of every sector with proper numbers and figures. The pictures are also contextual and provide meaningful insight into the topic. The writer could have improved on uploading more illustrations, graphs, and comparison charts to divide the financial sector. This would help the user get more understanding with graphical visualizations. This article is well-developed and has discussed the overall sector that the Atlanta Economy has.