User:ShaneDenial17/sandbox

Choosing an article

Monkey King


 * 1) Yes it is as it gives contextual evidence of the character plus his history.
 * 2) Seems rather neutral as it gives factual evidence
 * 3) Each claim has a citation to it and the one section that does not mentions that the information is coming from the source material by saying "According to..."
 * 4) The sources seem to be reliable. The links go where they need to go to plus the source from the book is in there which is the most important when talking about the character
 * 5) There is not a lot of information from other people which makes me curious whether others have contributed or if all this research has been done by an official sort of person.

Cupid/Eros and Psyche


 * 1) Not only does it focus on the pair but since the article is about him in particular, it gives information about Eros
 * 2) Seems rather neutral as it gives factual evidence
 * 3) The article seemed does not seem as highly cited in sections despite the huge amount of sources it has
 * 4) The sources seem reliable as there is a great number of them.
 * 5) There is some information of this article from other Wikipedia writers

Hades and Persephone


 * 1) This article certainly tackles the lore of the pair but just like with the piece with Eros, it focuses on Hades.
 * 2) Seems rather neutral as it gives factual evidence
 * 3) This article is very well cited. Like previous it cites what is not plainly said "According to..." whatever that may be.
 * 4) The sources are reliable and have a great number of sources.
 * 5) There are a lot of writers that are working on this however it is not 100% professional with it. Plus it is a lot to take in

Sources:


 * Wu Cheng'en and Anthony Yu. The Journey to the West: Vol. 2
 * https://pittcat.pitt.edu/vwebv/holdingsInfo?bibId=81210