User:Shannonscullion4/Emotional support animal/22liberty Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

user:Shannonscullion4


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Emotional support animal


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Emotional support animal

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

The edits that were made to the introduction both reflected the new content added, and was concise with information that was later explained in the article. The lead

Content:

The content that has been added is up to date, as well as relevant as they added information about Canadian legislation as well as the difference between service dogs and ESA animals, which I believe is relevant and important information that should be added.

Tone and Balance:

The content added was written in an informational and neutral tone. The reasoning behind the content additions also made sense as they added to the quality of the article by expanding on topics that needed more information previously.

Sources and References:

Sources and links met the quality standard.

Organization:

This article is well written, and headers are used to break up the topics which is easier to read.

Overall Impression:

I believe that Shannon did a good job updating this article to add more information for those wanting to learn more about emotional support animals, and added necessary missing information explaining some of the previously written material.