User:Shannonscullion4/World Scientists' Warning to Humanity/Shannonscullion4 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * World Scientists' Warning to Humanity
 * World Scientists' Warning to Humanity

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: I think the lead in this article is a little confusing and should use simpler language to get straight to the point. I think it makes it complicated for the reader to know exactly what they will be reading about.

Content: The content is good and speaks about exactly what the title explains the article to be. It talks about the notices sent out about climate change. How ever, I think more information could be added, the article is quite short. Since it is talking about global warning and climate change the authors should include ways to improve climate change and how people can help.

Tone: I think the tone is good, the article is not biased and provides information in a neutral manner.

Sources and references: The articles uses a decent amount of sources however, the bibliography is not very long. The sources and references seem to be credible which is a good sign.

Organization: Although there is not much information within this article it is organized well into sub sections. The sub sections make is easy to follow which is good for the reader.

Images and Media: Within this article there are no images which is not good. I believe this article could have added many images to inform the reader on how bad climate change and global warning is. A lot of people are visual people, therefore, I think adding pictures is always a good idea.