User:ShaoniD/Helen B. Taussig/Cbakle Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Shaoni Dasgupta
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:ShaoniD/Helen B. Taussig

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Concise

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, all of it is relevant and accounted for
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes, to my knowledge and research it is
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Not sure about the first part of the page before the Early Life and Career Section is supposed to be there

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes, there are no biased viewpoints
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? I feel as if the early life and career can be split up and developed more.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, all of it is telling a story rather than persuading

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes all of the citations are reliable
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? It is concise and easy to understand
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? I think career and early life should be split up.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No
 * Are images well-captioned? No images
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? No images
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? No images

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

Not a new article.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? The article is more complete and has additional information. The sources found are extensive and of a good variety.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The new content can provide more interesting and additional work done by Helen Taussig as her work needs to be shown some light.
 * How can the content added be improved? I think there can be more development and addition to the collaborations section as it is unfinished

Overall evaluation
I enjoyed reading this article. The new additions provide more information that would go unseen and unlearned if not for the additions. Helen Taussig would approve and this sparked some curiosity in me. I want to learn more about Taussig and have a conversation with her.